Peer Review History: The Role of Telemedicine in Improving Healthcare Outcome: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pradip K. Bhowmik, Professor, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kr. Goswami, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research Hospital, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Rakesh Kith, Niloufer Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana Jain, NDVSU, India.

(2) Guyguy Kabundi Tshima, Université de Montréal, Canada.

(3) Jamal kh-Madhloom, University of Wasit, Iraq.

(4) Kunur Shah, IKDRC. India.

(5) Nicolae Bacalbasa, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(6) Reena R, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, India.

(7) Starr Seip, USA.

(8) Suyog Sindhu, KGMU, India.

(9) Valentina DIvocha, Ukraine.

(10) Zagrai Gavrilă, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(11) Zahraa Kamaz. Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dilip Kr. Goswami, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rakesh Kith, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Purse Seine Vessel Design under 100 GT Based on the Characteristics of South Sulawesi Waters in Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyambodo Nur Ardi Nugroho, Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia.

(2) A V Pavan Kumar, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Thangalakshmi, Indian Maritime University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Priyambodo Nur Ardi Nugroho, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A V Pavan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis of Vinyl Esters of Fruit Acids under High Pressure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wolfgang Linert, Professor, Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology Getreidemarkt, Austria.

Reviewers:

(1) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(2) Chaitanya Vijaykumar Mahamuni, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chaitanya Vijaykumar Mahamuni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Communities Associated with Dominant Tree Species in a Subarctic Limestone Area

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, College of Agriculture, AL -Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) GP Hadebe, CUT, South Africa.

(3) Ravindra Sachan, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(4) Meksy Dianawati, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Pandey, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, India.

(2) Dodo Juliet Dingtsen, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(3) Hossein Habibi, Iran.

(4) Sanjay Kumar Gupta, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (GP Hadebe, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ravindra Sachan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Meksy Dianawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Evaluation and Characterization of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Annona muricata L. Leaf Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Nazarath Begum, Sadakathullah Appa College, India

(2) M. Sivakami, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Narsinh M. Dodia, Saurashtra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) V. Thirumurugan, A.V.V.M. Sri Pushpam College(Autonomous), India.

(2) Suyog Sindhu, KGMU, India.

(3) CH. Pragathi, GSL medical College, YSR University, India.

(4) G. Indramahalakshmi, Cardamom  Planters’ Association College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(5) Mali Sunayana Mallappa, Sahyadri College of Pharmacy, India.

(6) Nidhal Mohammed Salih  AL-Janabi, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(7) Ram Prakash Chauhan, Govt. College Jukhala, India.

(8) Shiddanagouda.K.B, RGUHS, S. S. Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Nazarath Begum, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Sivakami, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Narsinh M. Dodia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: India’s Organic Agriculture A Vision for a Healthy Country

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) M. K. Poonia, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Mohsen Mansour, Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, Tunisia.

(3) Jamal Abdul Rahman Tawfeeq, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Darwin Pangaribuan, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Bidyut Prava Mishra, C. V. Sc. & A. H, India.

(3) Jinisha Blessie Jp, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. K. Poonia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohsen Mansour, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jamal Abdul Rahman Tawfeeq, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Spacing and Varieties on Growth, Quality and Yield in Onion (Allium cepa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Carmine Boniello, University of Salerno, Italy.

(2) Mohammed Ali Makki Al Rubaee, Wasit University, Iraq.

(3) I Nengah Muliarta, Warmadewa University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pabitra Kumar Biswas, India.

(2) Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Université Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carmine Boniello, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammed Ali Makki Al Rubaee, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (I Nengah Muliarta, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Blood and Urine Profiles of Remogliflozin in Rat PK Study Using a Single and Simple UPLC Method

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mali Sunayana Mallappa, Sahyadri College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Kalyana Ramu Buridi, Visakha Government Degree College of Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Feyyaz Onur, Lokman Hekim University, Turkey.

(2) Safa Majeed Hameed, University of Kufa, Iraq.

(3) Hariprasad R, Dr. TN. MGR Medical University, India.

(4) Mahmoud Mohamed Elalfy Elhefnawy , Mansoura University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mali Sunayana Mallappa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kalyana Ramu Buridi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Detection of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Gene in Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella Species in Jos North Central of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sinan Ince, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagappa Guttiganur, R.G.U.H.S Health Sciences, A.M.E S Dental College, India.

(2) Zainab M. Al-Zubaidy, Diyala University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abidali G. Bhagat, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shimaa Mahmoud Abdel-latif shabayek, Al-Azhar University “Girls”, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nagappa Guttiganur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zainab M. Al-Zubaidy, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Influenced by Biofertilizers and Phosphorus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shehan Habib, Bangladesh.

(2) Sanjay Swami, Topiwala National Medical College, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cristina B. Colloca, Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (UNTDF), Argentina.

(2) Norida Mazlan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Syed khalid Mustafa, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shehan Habib, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sanjay Swami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA