Peer Review History: Assessment of the Post-Marketing “Drug Ineffective” Reports Received by the Saudi Vigilance System

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Prasanthi, G. Pulla Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) N. Venkata Naga Jyothi, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, Assam University, India.

(4) Fakhria Jaber Muhaibes, College of Nursing, AL Mustaqbel University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Anupama, KVSR, India.

(2) Şahan Saygi, Near East University, North Cyprus.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alaa Al-Deen Al-Dabbagh, Mustansiriya University College of Medicine, Iraq.

(2) Festus D. Otajevwo, Western Delta University, Nigeria.

(3) Nafrialdi, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (D. Prasanthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (N. Venkata Naga Jyothi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Fakhria Jaber Muhaibes, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Posted in Review History.