Peer Review History: A Study on the Ex-Situ Conservation and Promotion of Medicinal Plants in Dr. Sushila Tiwari Herbal Garden, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniela Rigano, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

(2) Prof. Patrizia Diana, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

(3) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagham Mahmood Aljamali, Iraq.

(2) Tran Van Minh, School of Biotechnology, International University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam National University, Vietnam.

(3) Anand Kumar Gond, University of Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) E. Gayathri Priyadharshini, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, India.

(2) Hemalatha. K, Acharya & BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Huda Enaya Mahood, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

(4) Mini K V, Mahayogi Gorakhnath University Gorakhpur (MGUG), Guru Gorakshnath Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(5) Mrunalini R Kanvinde, D Y Patil Medical College, India.

(6) Naveen B.S, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science and Research, Affiliated to Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Indian.

(7) Nelida Soria Rey, National University of Pilar, Paraguay.

(8) Seyed Mehdi Razavi, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

(9) Srirengaraj Vijayaram, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, Taiwan.

(10) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(11) Thitiphan Chimsook, Maejo University, Thailand.

(12) Ujjal Kumar Pati, India.

(13) Wafai Z. A. Mikhail, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Faraneh Zareiyan, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, Iran.

(2) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University Of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(3) Hemant Sarin, USA.

(4) Sagar Madhukar Chavan, D. Y. Patil Agriculture and Technical University, India.

(5) Sonam Bhutia, Government Pharmacy College Sajong, Sikkim University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nagham Mahmood Aljamali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tran Van Minh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anand Kumar Gond, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Posted in Review History.