Peer Review History: Marketing Behaviour of Young Chrysanthemum Growers in Salem District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Abera Teshome Aleli, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Fachrurazi, Pontianak State Institute of Islamic Studies, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Georgios Tsekouropoulos, International Hellenic University, Greece.

(2) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, CHF, Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Manoj Kumar Das, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abera Teshome Aleli, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fachrurazi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formation of Male Sex Tilapia Larvae (Oreochromis niloticus) Using Natural Methyltestosterone Hormone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tijoy Lowore, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Malawi.

(2) Yahaya Tajudeen, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ravindragouda Patil, KVAFSU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Haeruddin, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(2) Mbaye Tine, Gaston Berger University, Senegal.

(3) Musingi B. M, Egerton University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tijoy Lowore, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yahaya Tajudeen, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effectiveness of Local Potential-Based Learning Modules on Creative and Entrepreneurial Project Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E. Seda Koç, Associate Professor, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Suman Kumar, School of Business, SR University, India.

(2) Zahra Nejatifar, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lingam Sampath, Balaji Institute of Management Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) C P Rashmi, Presidency University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Suman Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zahra Nejatifar, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Zero Trust Architecture in Cloud Networks: Application, Challenges and Future Opportunities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, Associated Professor, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Robiah Binti Yusof, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Jose Ramon Coz Fernández, University Complutense of Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Robiah Binti Yusof, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jose Ramon Coz Fernández, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reimagining Teacher Preparation: Digital Literacy in the Post-Pandemic Era

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suo Yan Ju, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Johnstone B. Musungu, Moi University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vaibhavi Gawarikar, Navrachana University, India.

(2) R. Selvaganapathy, Indra Ganesan College of Education, India.

(3) Shehrevar Davierwala, Gandhinagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suo Yan Ju, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Johnstone B. Musungu, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Undergraduate Physics Self-Efficacy Measurement and Gender Influence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaik Rehana Banu, Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

(2) Indrya Mulyaningsih, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaik Rehana Banu, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indrya Mulyaningsih. Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Does the Effect of Different Governance Channels Depend on the Level of Development of African Countries?

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Raed Awashreh, A’Sharqiyah University, Oman.

(2) Cezalia Buyanza-Mwidima, St.Augustine University of Tanzania, Tanzania.

(3) Aditi Goswami, Bankura University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Ramesh, Sr & Bgnr Government Arts & Science College (A) Khammam, India.

(2) Yusuf Olanrewaju Lateef, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nosheen Khan, Ghazi University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raed Awashreh, Oman) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cezalia Buyanza-Mwidima, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aditi Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining the Ideal Index for Assessing Detrusor Contractility in Women: Insights from Urodynamic Diagnosis and Age

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Zoran Todorovic, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade and University Medical Center “Bezanijska kosa”, Serbia.

(2) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tayyaba Mustafa Mian, Fatima Memorial College of Medicine and Dentistry, Pakistan.

(2) J. Gnanaraj, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mba Chidinma Goodness, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Juan Pablo Valdevenito, Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Chile.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tayyaba Mustafa Mian, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Gnanaraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cultural Values and Intercultural Sensitivity among College of Teacher Education Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Akbar Azizifar, Associate professor, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Rafli, Makassar State University, Indonesia.

(2) Yingsheng Liu, University of California, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ibnu Hajar, Universitas Bumi Persada, Indonesia.

(2) Saleh Ali Nuri Abdalla, Azzytuna University, Libya.

(3) Wangkheirakpam Radhapiyari Devi, DM College of Teacher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Rafli, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yingsheng Liu, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gender Intra-Household Dynamics Comparison of Paddy Profitability Due to the Adoption of Improved Agriculture Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqsa Tahir, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Ishita Mandla, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aarati Ghimire, Himalayan College of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (HICAST), Purbanchal University, Nepal.

(2) Farzad Rassaei, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan), Iran.

(3) Sukanya S, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Arun Makal, University of Calcutta, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqsa Tahir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ishita Mandla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA