Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Flora Balieva, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway.

(2) Tejash H Sharma, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute & Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Urviben Jyotishkumar Maheta, Nootan College of Physiotherapy, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahmed Isse Ali, Mogadishu Somali Turkiye Training and Reserach Hospital, Somalia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Flora Balieva, Norway) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejash H Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sinimol. T.P, India.

(2) Chetna, Kailash Hospital and Heart Institute, India.

(3) Arpita  K. Vaidya, Dinsha Patel College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hassenine Alikareem Alrekaby, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Manumula Rajaram, National Research Institute of Unani Medicine for Skin Disorders, India.

(3) Naumana Rehman, Khyber Medical University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sinimol. T.P, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chetna, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arpita K. Vaidya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prabhakar Tamboli, Adjunct Professor, University of Maryland, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Sajjad, University Bahauddin Zakariya, Pakistan.

(2) Jawa Mohsen Daoud, Tishreen University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Debashish Hota, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A Khavieya, IIT Madras, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Sajjad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jawa Mohsen Daoud, Syria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Neelima Agarwal, Santosh Deemed to be University, India.

(2) N S Chithambaram, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahmed M Abbas Sadek, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

(2) Rajesh kumar Mishra, Military Hospital, Amritsar, India.

(3) Swapana John, Sophia Girls’ College (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neelima Agarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N S Chithambaram, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vikas Kumar, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Vikram Narayan Anap, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Anayatullah Nayaji, Ch.B. P Govt Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chetana Basyal, BHU, Nepal.

(2) Shivani Thakur, KVK, India.

(3) Suman, K. M, Institute of Agribusiness Management, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Maria Dojçe, University of “Fan S. Noli”, Albania.

(2) Rakesh Ahuja, International Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vikas Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikram Narayan Anap, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anayatullah Nayaji, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eyal Lewin, Assistant Professor, Ariel University, Israel.

(2) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

(3) Dr. Vlasta Hus, Professor, University of Maribor, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejeshwari B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

(2) Kakooza Victoria, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tejeshwari B V, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kakooza Victoria, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, “F. Perinei” Hospital, Altamura (BA), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mastaneh Moghtaderi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Mona Fazel Ghaziyani, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mastaneh Moghtaderi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mona Fazel Ghaziyani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Khadija Muktar Sukola, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

(2) Ramazan Erenler, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Turkiye.

(3) Dennis Jack Opwoko, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agustina Intan Niken Tari, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara, Indonesia.

(2) Alimuddin Ali, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(3) Astri Zulfa, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia.

(4) Chafiaa Mazri, Akli Mohand Oulhadj University of Bouria, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khadija Muktar Sukola, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramazan Erenler, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dennis Jack Opwoko, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) María Luisa Flores Urpe, National University of San Marcos, Peru.

(2) Jeyaraj John Sekar, The American College, India.

(3) Lok Raj Sharma, Makawanpur Multiple Campus, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bharti Kaushik , NCERT, India.

(2) Ivana Maria Gamerman, Federal University of Southern Bahia, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (María Luisa Flores Urpe, Peru) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jeyaraj John Sekar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fernando Jose Cebola Lidon, Professor, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pratap Kumar Panda, A.B. College, India.

(2) Juan Carlos Salcedo Reyes, Pontifical Javierian University, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Laminou Manzo Ousmane, Dan Dicko Dankoulodo University of Maradi, Niger.

(2) Tina Olubukola Isichei, Petroleum Training Institute Effurun, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pratap Kumar Panda, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juan Carlos Salcedo Reyes, Colombia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA