Peer Review History: Investigating Key Factors Influencing Consumer Food Practices and Choices for Ensuring Food Safety: A Case Study of Coimbatore Residents

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kotha, Niloufer Hospital, India.

(2) Semanga Mabuza, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashok Panigrahi, NMIMS University, India.

(2) Samrena Jabeen, Arab Open University, Bahrain.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rakesh Kotha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Semanga Mabuza, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Different Levels of NPK and Neem Cake on Soil Health under Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Var. Gomati

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Montaser F. Abdel-Monaim, Professor, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Crammer Kaizzi Kayuki, National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda.

(2) Shyamrao Kulkarni, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

(2) U V Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Renato L. Lapitan, University of the Philippines Los Banos, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Crammer Kaizzi Kayuki, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shyamrao Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Soil Fertility through GIS Techniques and Thematic Mapping in Rice Growing Areas of Jagtial District in Telangana State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Mohandas, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) James Kamau Mbugua, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afam-Ezeaku Chikaodili Eziamaka, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Bi G. Crépin Pene, Int. Univ. of Gd Bassam, Ivory Coast.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ankur Kumar Tanwar, University of Delhi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Mohandas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (James Kamau Mbugua, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genotype x Environment Interactions and Stability of Gran Yield of Maize Hybrids across Sudanian and Sudano-Sahelian Agro-ecological Zones in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC) P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Sree Devi, Institute of Rice Research, India.

(2) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mustika Tuwo, Universitas Hasanuddin, South Sulawesi.

(2) R. Mahalakshmi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Endang Nurcahyani, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Mahua Banerjee, Visva-Bharati University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (B. Sree Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Zero-Till Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Geetha, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Sugar Research Institute of Fiji, India.

(2) Gustavo Lopes Toled, FACOP and UNINOVE, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N. Geetha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gustavo Lopes Toled, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison between DTPA Extracting Methods for Available Zinc with Multinutrient Extractants in Vertisols and Inceptisols

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Randa Shafik Georgy Makar, Agricultural and Biological Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) James Peaches Phiri, Malawi.

(2) Narcísio Cabral de Araújo, Federal University of Southern Bahia, Brazil.

(3) Pratik Ramteke, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Akinrinmade AO, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(2) Cicilia Novi Primiani, PGRI Madiun University, Madiun.

(3) M. V. Sriramachandrasekharan, Annamalai University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Randa Shafik Georgy Makar, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Motivational Factors of Learners for Enrolling in Organic Farming Certificate Course through Open and Distance Learning (ODL)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ching Yee Yong, School of Engineering and Technology, University of Technology, Malaysia.

(2) Jacob Aaworb-Nang Maabobr Kor, College for Community and Organisational Development, Ghana.

(3) Constance Chifamba, Solusi University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) David C. Coker, Fort Hays State University, USA.

(2) Jacob Aaworb-Nang Maabobr Kor, College for Community and Organisational Development, Ghana.

(3) Liliana Rodrigues, University of Madeira, Portugal.

(4) Roleen B. Moleño, Carmen National High School-Senior High School, Philippines.

(5) Sompoet Panawas, Suan Dusit University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Agung Ramadhanu, Universitas Putra Indonesia “YPTK” Padang, Indonesia.

(2) Oyarinde O. N, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ching Yee Yong, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jacob Aaworb-Nang Maabobr Kor, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Constance Chifamba, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physio-Chemical Changes during Ethrel Treatment of Mango cv. Alphonso under Different Temperature Regimes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramesh Babu, School of Business, SR University, India.

(2) Razifah Mohd Razali, Universiti Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enrique Rico García, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, México.

(2) Shyamrao Kulkarni, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ramesh Babu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Razifah Mohd Razali, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of a Pump as Turbine in a Simplified Pico Hydropower System with Provision for Water Recycling

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sudip Sengupta, Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, Swami Vivekananda University, West Bengal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Lima Nascimento, Institute of Physics, University of Brasilia, Brazil.

(2) Pa. Suriya, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) André Felippe Vieira da Cunha, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Brazil.

(2) Sushanth H Gowda, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU), India.

(3) Yasir Zulfiqar, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gheorghe Grigoras, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Rajesh Kumar, Maa Sheetala Devi Trijugi Narayan Mahila Mahavidalya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Daniel Lima Nascimento, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pa. Suriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis among Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Landraces Genotypes for Grain Yield Characters under Irrigated

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India

Reviewers:

(1) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

(2) Dorcas Olubunmi Ibitoye, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Salam Thanoon Khaleel Alabar, Nineveh Directorate of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dommalapati Sudhakara Rao, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi.

(3) Prashanth Sangannavar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dorcas Olubunmi Ibitoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA