Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Redhwan Ahmed Mohammed Al-Naggar, Professor, National University of Malaysia, Cheras, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nawiroh Vera, Universitas Budi Luhur, Indonesia.

(2) Sonal Chabra, Rawal College of Education, India.

(3) Bharti Kaushik, CIET, NCERT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Antonio Luque De La Rosa, Universidad De Almería, Spain.

(2) Firooz Sadighi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Jose Manuel Salum Tome, Catholic University of Temuco, Chile.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tchable Boussanlègue, University of Kara, Togo.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nawiroh Vera, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sonal Chabra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Bharti Kaushik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Totohasina André, ENSET, University of Antsiranana, Madagascar.

(2) Jollanda Shara, University “Eqrem Cabej”, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anwar Hossain, New Mexico Tech, USA.

(2) Francisco Augusto Aparecido Gomes, Federal University of Technology, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Saad Abdullah Manaa, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Totohasina André, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jollanda Shara, Albania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S Y Mulkipatil, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, RGUHS University, India.

(2) Todd Richards, University of Washington Medical Center, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atiyeh Rezaei, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(2) Diego Da Silva, Uniensino, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abeer Refaiy, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) Mahomed Sidique Abdul Cadar Dada, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S Y Mulkipatil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Todd Richards, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Mochamad Lazuardi, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Balram Ji Omar, AIIMS, India.

(2) Bello, O. A, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Sk Chand Basha, KL (Deemed to be University), India.

(4) Kiguli James Mukasa, Soroti University, Uganda.

(5) Madhumati Varma, India.

(6) Rahayu Fitriani Wangsa Putrie, Indonesia.

(7) Uday Raj Sharma, BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anil Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mochamad Lazuardi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Avdesh Bhardawaj, India.

(2) Kamal Kant, Aspee Shakilam Biotechnology Institute, Navsari  Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Tanta University, Egypt.

(3) Kapil Kumar Sharma, CPRI, India.

(4) Maamoun Ahmed Abdel-Moneam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(5) UV Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Avdesh Bhardawaj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kamal Kant, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yakov G. Verkhivker, Odessa National University of Technology, Ukraine.

(2) Aziz Benhamrouche, Ferhat Abbas University Setif1, Algeria.

(3) Işın Onur, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa, Sohag University, Egypt.

(2) Adeola Akinrinmade, Al-Hikmah University, Nigeria.

(3) Arafat Rahman, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

(4) Chairil Anwar Siregar, National Institute of Research and Innovation, Indonesia.

(5) Eliza E. Camaso, Central Luzon State University, Philippines.

(6) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(7) S. Muthusamy, V.O.Chidambaram College, India.

(8) Subin K Jose, Christ College Autonomous, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Olumuyiwa Idowu Ojo, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yakov G. Verkhivker, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aziz Benhamrouche, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Işın Onur, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Balakrishnan, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Bashir A Rather, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Balakrishnan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bashir A Rather, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolas Padilla-Raygoza, Directorate of Teaching and Research, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, Guanajuato, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Munmun Sengupta, University of Calcutta, CMRI Hospital, India.

(2) Katarzyna Rygiel, Silesian Medical University, Poland.

(3) Gilberto Cairo Sáez, Universidad Medica de Villa Clara, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aditi Munmun Sengupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Katarzyna Rygiel, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gilberto Cairo Sáez, Cuba) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. C. V. Sameer Kumar, Head, PJTSAU,  India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangeeta Garg, Mewar Institute of Management, CCS University, India.

(2) Jollanda Shara, University “Eqrem Cabej”, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Felix Nes Mabel, St. Xavier’s Catholic College of Engineering, India.

(2) Maad M. Mijwil, Baghdad College of Economic Sciences University, Iraq.

(3) Nalini Vaidya, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, India.

(4) Norma Aparecida de Oliveira Nobre, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sangeeta Garg, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jollanda Shara, Albania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Arjun B. Chhetri, Dalhousie University, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabal Pratap Singh, RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Suman Kumari Joshi, CVSc. & A.H, India.

(3) Hafsan, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Allah Bux Kachiwal, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prabal Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suman Kumari Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hafsan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA