Peer Review History: Milk Producers Perceptions on Constraints in Milk Production in Maharashtra State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Plesa Anca Dorina, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Ruchi Singh, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, India.

(3) Prafullakumar Vasantrao Patil, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MAFSU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Channappagouda Biradar, KVAFSU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Plesa Anca Dorina, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ruchi Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Prafullakumar Vasantrao Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge on Spiritual Life Skills among Agriculture Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tulus T.H. Tambunan, Professor, Center for Industry, SME and Competition Studies, University of Trisakti, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Western University, Thailand.

(2) Maryam Shamsaei, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Amador Cernuda-Lago, King Juan Carlos University, Spain.

(4) Nazmi Nazni Noordin, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ilgaitis Prūsis, Riga Technical University, Latvia.

(2) Nirmal Kumar Betchoo, Université Des Mascareignes, Mauritius.

(3) Vijay Kumar Mishra, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maryam Shamsaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amador Cernuda-Lago, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Nazmi Nazni Noordin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Nano Fertilizers on Yield, Attributes and Economics of Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Université Antananarivo, Madagascar.

(2) Ana Maria Arambarri, La Plata National University, Argentina.

(3) Ashim Midya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Kahlel, Northern Technical  University, Iraq.

(2) Cardei Petru, The National Institute of Research – Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry – INMA, Romania.

(3) Gopal Lal Choudhary, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ana Maria Arambarri, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ashim Midya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Soil Properties Using Geospatial Techniques at DDUCE-OF Farm

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-Rahman A. Mustafa, Sohag University, Egypt.

(2) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(3) Amira Shawky Soliman, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alfonso Benítez de la Torre.

(2) Aziz Benhamrouche, Ferhat Abbas University Setif1, Algeria.

(3) James Peaches Phiri, Malawi.

(4) Tanmoy Basu, Katwa College University of Burdwan, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdel-Rahman A. Mustafa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dwi Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amira Shawky Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic Use of Serum Ferritin as a Predictor of Hospital Outcome at Admission in Patients with Infective Endocarditis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hani Nabeel Mufti, Assistant Professor, College of Medicine-Jeddah, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia and King Faisal Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejeshwari B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

(2) Chunmei Qi, Xuzhou Medical University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amel Ouyahia, University Ferhat Abbas 1, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tejeshwari B V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chunmei Qi, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Using Oxygen Bioavailability and Somatic Embryogenesis Techniques for Regeneration of Old Seeds of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Imran Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU), Multan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mtibaa Latifa, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia.

(2) Surya Satya Sravanthi Pammi, SVRK Government Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Guillermo Martín Caille, National University of Patagonia San Juan Bosco (UNPSJB), Argentina.

(2) Hamdy M. Abdel-Rahman, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Miriam de la Caridad Núñez Vázquez, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Cuba.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mtibaa Latifa, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Surya Satya Sravanthi Pammi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adoption of Recommended Production Technologies of Soybean by Farmers of Dharwad District of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Agriculture Economy Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Agustiniana University, Colombia.

(3) J. B. Kathiriya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(4) Chandan Kumar Panda, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jayanta Kumar Das, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Prabowo Tjitropranoto, IPB University, Indonesia.

(3) Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute, Sierra Leone.

(4) S. Durairaj, Annamalai University, India.

(5) Samah Metwally Mahmoud Abd EL-Aziz, The National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (J. B. Kathiriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Chandan Kumar Panda, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determination of Antibiotic Prescription Pattern in Private Healthcare Facilities in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Suma B V, Assistant Professor, Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Fauna Herawati, Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia.

(2) Jayita Goswami, USA.

(3) Dharmashree Satyarup, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Gangotri, Government Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Changping  Li, The Affiliated Hospital  of  Southwest Medical  University, China.

(3) Grettchen Flores Sandi, University of Costa Rica, Costa Rica.

(4) Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Allama Iqbal Open University, Pakistan.

(5) Ramnath Takiar, National Cancer Registry Program, Indian Council of Medical Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fauna Herawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jayita Goswami, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Dharmashree Satyarup, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Role of Valley Bottom Farming Systems (Vinyungu) for Enhanced Food Stability in a Changing Climate Epoch in Rural Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anthony R. Lupo, Professor, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hind Bushra Ahmed Ibrahim, Ahfad University for Women, Sudan.

(2) Jhon Hardy Purba, Universitas Panji Sakti, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Universidade Paulista – UNIP, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hind Bushra Ahmed Ibrahim, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jhon Hardy Purba, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Character Association Analysis on Morpho-physiological and Yield Parameters of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Water Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sufia Zaman, Techno India University, India.

(2) Ravindra Sachan, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Nguyen Thi Lang, High Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharmeswar Barman, Goalpara College, Gauhati University, India.

(2) Anju Pathania, DAV University, India.

(3) M.R. Dhiman, ICAR-IARI, India.

(4) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(5) Olumuyiwa Idowu Ojo, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(6) Saraa Abdulaziz Abrahem, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(7) Sheenam Thatai, Amity University, India.

(8) Vasilescu Liliana, National Agricultural Research and Development Institute Fundulea, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sufia Zaman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ravindra Sachan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nguyen Thi Lang, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA