Peer Review History: Synergistic Benefits of Combined Application of Manures and Chemical Fertilizers: Enhancing Growth and Yield of Rice and Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Renjith P.S, Scientist, ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS- KukmaBhuj, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hani Mehanna, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) M. Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dayananda H. S., Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, India.

(2) Mukesh Baboo, Hindu College, Moradabad, India.

(3) Nikiéma Dominique, University Joseph KI-Zerbo, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bhuvaneswari Rajagopal, ANJAC, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hani Mehanna, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Ananthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seed Priming and Media for Enhanced Seedling Growth in Pansy (Viola tricolor)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Aruni Buddhika, St Vincents Medical Research Institute, Australia.

(2) Shingare Rupali Manual, University of Pune, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sunita Agrawal, L B S PG College, India.

(2) Wilda Amananti, Politeknik Harapan Bersama, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Yahia Ibrahim Mohammed Abutaba, University of Kordofan, Sudan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aruni Buddhika, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shingare Rupali Manual, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sandhoff’s Disease: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Supriya Chagdal, Shatabadi Hospital, India.

(2) Suresh Kanna S, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Supriya Chagdal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suresh Kanna S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biochemical Aspects of Cell Staining

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Prof. Khadiga Mohamed Abu-Zied, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Ramya, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Shruti Bhatnagar, Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute, India.

(3) Mona Sharma, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madhukar Saxena, BBAU, India.

(2) Samiullah A Auti, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Aakriti Baijal, SRMSIMS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Ramya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shruti Bhatnagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mona Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimisation of Advanced Nutrient Solutions for Escalating Crop Production under Hydroponic Systems: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saheb Pal, Scientist, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Denis A. Cabrera-Munguia, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, México.

(2) Hamid Reza Soufi, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mareli Telaumbanua, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Thadius N. Maisa, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Denis A. Cabrera-Munguia, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamid Reza Soufi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on the Challenges Encountered by Eri Silkworm Rearers in Tapioca Cultivation and Eri Rearing in Udalguri District of Assam

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shambhavi H T, University of Agricultural Science, India.

(2) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar, Uzbekistan.

(2) Pradeep Kumar Mishra, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Siripuk Suraporn, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(2) Yousif Abd El-Aziz Elhassaneen, Minoufiya University, Egypt.

(3) Shebin El-Kom, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shambhavi H T, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mihai- Iacob Bențea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Beyond Conventional Threat Defense: Implementing Advanced Threat Modeling Techniques, Risk Modeling Frameworks and Contingency Planning in the Healthcare Sector for Enhanced Data Security

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Senbagavalli M, Alliance University, India.

(2) Archana H R, BMS College of Engineering, India.

(3) Bambang D. Suseno, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sisca, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Sultan Agung, Indonesia.

(2) S. Nagarani, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, Indian.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Senbagavalli M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana H R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bambang D. Suseno, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Extraction and Chromatographic Techniques for Organophosphate Pesticidal Residue Analysis in Paddy and Rice Bran

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Devendra Singh Lodhi, R.G.P.V, India.

(2) Zeenath Ruhy, Mother Teresa College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Firas Abd Kati, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Johnson John Omale, Federal University of Allied Health Sciences, Nigeria.

(3) Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devendra Singh Lodhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zeenath Ruhy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Gas-Oil Ratio on Oil Production for a Niger Delta Well

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ehsan Ghanaatpisheh Senani, Iran.

(2) M. Santhosh, Nehru Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hitesh Panchal, Gujarat Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Myroslava Chernova, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ehsan Ghanaatpisheh Senani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Santhosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Productivity and Profitability of Fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) as Affected by Integrated Nutrient Management: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hirdesh Kumar Sachan, Associate Professor, College of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands.

(2) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandhya Amol Jagtap, Mudhoji College, India.

(2) Meziane Rahla, Institute of Veterinary Sciences and Agronomic Sciences, University of Batna1, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Devipriya Rabin Majumder, Abeda Inamdar Senior College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandhya Amol Jagtap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Meziane Rahla, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA