Peer Review History: Evaluation of In vitro Antioxidant Activities and In vivo Antidiabetic Activity of Hygrophila schulli (Buch.-Ham.) Leaf Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Principal, Rajeev College of Pharmacy (Approved by PCI, New Delhi, Recongised by Government of Karnataka, RGUHS, Bangalore), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amar P. Garg, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(2) Bouzidi Soumia, University of BATNA 2, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Munther Abduljaleel Muhammad-Ali, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Sergey Viktorovich Petrov, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amar P. Garg, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bouzidi Soumia, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Genetic Variability in Maize Genotypes under Infestation by the Maize Storage Weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Using Multivariate Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem Ali Abdel-Raheem, Egypt.

(2) Mohammed Abu Edeo, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Abdel-Raheem Ali Abdel-Raheem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Abu Edeo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Experimental Study to Appraise the Role of Cina 30CH in Controlling Ascochyta Blight Fungus in Pisum sativum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Md. Abiar Rahman, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman- Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Uqbah Iqbal, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.

(2) Satya Narayan Jatolia, Govt Dungar College, MGS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dona Thomas, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uqbah Iqbal, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satya Narayan Jatolia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Household Wood Requirements and the Substitution Potential of Bamboo (Bambusa vulgaris) Available to Peasants in Forest Areas of Cameroon: A Case Study in Ebolowa 2

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Eyide Odeworitse, University of Delta, Nigeria.

(2) Sunny Dhiman, Chandigarh College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mykola M. Zhovmir, Institute of Renewable Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Wondwosen Shiferaw Aga, State University of New York, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eyide Odeworitse, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunny Dhiman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Acute Oral Toxicity of Ayucee Premix Polyherbal Poultry Formulation Containing Natural Vitamin C and Bioflavonoids

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) El Arabi Ilham, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

(2) Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (El Arabi Ilham, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Ahmed Saqib, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Different Spacings under Varying Fertility Levels on Protein Content, Protein Yield and Available NPK in Soil of Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Millicent Nkrumah Oppong, USA.

(2) Guilherme Amaral Ferreira, Salesian Catholic University Center, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Millicent Nkrumah Oppong, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Guilherme Amaral Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Characterization of Multi-Nutrient Formulations for Organic Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Kadhim M. Ibrahim, College of Biotechnology, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) P Soman, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bogdan-Vasile Cioruța, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Preeya P Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(3) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Elakiya, N., TNAU, India.

(2) Kerrouche Ibrahim, Mentouri’s Brother, Constantine 1, Algeria.

(3) Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh.

(4) Nitale M’Balikine KROU, University of Kara, Togo.

(5) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(6) S. Suresh, Sona College of Technology, India.

(7) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic Offa, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P Soman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chlamydia Infection among Women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria and Association with Socio-Demographic Factors

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) K Hanumanthayya, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, India.

(2) Leelani Rajapaksa, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manish Rajnikant Shah, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Sreelatha S, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jeyaraj Ravishankar, Tirunelveli Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K Hanumanthayya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Leelani Rajapaksa, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Polyamines on Post Harvest Physiology and Vase Life of Cut Gerbera

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepika Sahu, Mahatma Gandhi Horticulture and Forestry University, India.

(2) Banafsheh Gorji, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ashoke Hazra, A.K.P.C.Mahavidyalaya, Burdwan University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepika Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Banafsheh Gorji, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Anaemia a Monitoring Tool for Helminth Infection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ivan Pavlovic, Scientific Institute of Veterinary Medicine of Serbia, Serbia.

(2) Kirti Goel, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ivan Pavlovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kirti Goel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA