Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior of Students in Combating Mosquito Nest: A Case Study in High School

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravisankar Balasundaram, Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Richa Singh, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Luh Verra Sridyantari, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravisankar Balasundaram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Richa Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity and Distribution Patterns of Tick Fauna in Bannu and Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Eugene A. Silow, Laboratory of General Aquatic Biology of Institute of Biology, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Kumar Singh, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) K. Krishnappa, AVC College, Annamalai Univrsity, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1)  Dilip k. Kakavipure, B.N.N College Bhiwandi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bülent Bayraktar, Bayburt University, Turkey.

(2) M.Murali, St.Joseph University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit Kumar Singh, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Krishnappa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Transcutaneous Nylon Suture Versus Transcutaneous Skin Stapling for Closure of Midline Incision in Elective Abdominal Surgery: Assessment of Surgical Site Infections and Cosmesis in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Facility

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, Assistant Professor, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vivekanand Hiremath, St Johns Medical College Hospital, India.

(2) Dauphin Dighitoghi Moro, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) B.Bharathi, MMM College of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vivekanand Hiremath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dauphin Dighitoghi Moro, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Dyslipidaemia and Atherogenic Index in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Facility

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, Military Medical Academy, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic, Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Jain, Jain Hospital & Research Centre, India.

(2) Parth Patel, Civil Hospital, BJ Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Solomon Chiekezi Nwaneri, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parth Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Lipid Abnormalities in Senile Cataract: A Cross-Sectional Investigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Stephen G Schwartz, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alejandra Herranz-Cabarcos, Consorci Sanitari Integral Moisès Broggi, Spain.

(2) Luay Qasim Abdulhameed, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abolfazl Gilani, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alejandra Herranz-Cabarcos, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luay Qasim Abdulhameed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Clinical Response and Toxicities of Concurrent Weekly Cisplatin in Comparison to Weekly Paclitaxel with External Beam Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (IIB-IVA)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Waghmare Chaitali Maohar, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Azita Dilmaghani, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waghmare Chaitali Maohar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azita Dilmaghani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmacological Interventions in the Management of Alport Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shaimaa Ahmed Mostafa, Benha University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Reza Faraji, Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Sravani Koralla, Sir C R Reddy College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reza Faraji, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sravani Koralla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos Insecticide by Bacillus cereus ST06 and Chryseobacterium sp 6024 Isolated from Agricultural Soil, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikita Chauhan, Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry, India.

(2) Mehani Mouna, Ghardaïa University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madhusudan S, Maharani Science College. Maharani Cluster University, India.

(2) S.Gunalan, AMET University, India.

(3) Wasudeo B. Gurnule, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hadija Sukri, Universita Muslim Maros, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikita Chauhan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehani Mouna, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Osteomyelitis Unraveling Different Genre of Osteopetrosis: A Case Series

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Arati Neeli, KLE Academy of Higher Education, India.

(2) Elsharif Ahmed Bazie, Elimam Elmahdi University, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Frederico Andrade E Silva, Campinas University, São Paulo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arati Neeli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elsharif Ahmed Bazie, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Factors Associated with Mortality in Hospitalized Patients Aged 60 and Over at the Epidemic Treatment Center (ETC) of Saint-Louis (Senegal)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Win Myint Oo, Associate Professor, Sibu Clinical Campus, SEGi University, Malaysia.

(2) Dr. Jihad Adnani, University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Manjula Kv, JSS School of Nursing, India.

(2) Roma Sharma, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Career Point University, India.

(3) Alon Hillel Shulman, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

(4) Telly Purnamasari Agus, Research Center for Pre Clinical and Clinical Medicine, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manjula Kv, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roma Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alon Hillel Shulman, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Telly Purnamasari Agus, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA