Peer Review History: Growth Response of Wheat as Affected by Different Nutrient Sources and NPK Levels under Vertisols

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Samina Siddiqui, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Samina Siddiqui, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dwi Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Wheat Nitrogen and Protein Content in Agroforestry Systems for Climate-Resilience and Food Security

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

(2) Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Université Antananarivo, Madagascar.

(3) Udokang Anietie Edem, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amilcar Isidro Servín Niz, Universidad Nacional de Concepción, Paraguay.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bukola Margaret Popoola, Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria.

(2) Raj Singh, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Udokang Anietie Edem, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect on Yield, Attribute Character and Economics of Various Treatment in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ngangom Nonglen Meetei, India.

(2) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) José Carlos Fialho de Resende, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Radhey Shyam Singh, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ngangom Nonglen Meetei, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alireza Allameh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Demographic Factors Influencing Adoption of Modern Technologies among Tomato Smallholder Farmers: A Case of Mboga Na Matunda Project in Iringa District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Godsteven Peter Maro, Tanzania Coffee Research Institute, Tanzania.

(2) Maxwell Amedi, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon.

(2) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

(3) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Godsteven Peter Maro, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maxwell Amedi, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhanced Robust Estimators for Estimating Population Means When Confronted with Non-Response and Measurement Error

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sardar Hussain, Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan.

(2) Olawoyin, Olatunji Ishaq, Aliko Dangote University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jessica Quintanilha Kubrusly, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Olumide O. Ajayi, Adeleke University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sardar Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Olawoyin, Olatunji Ishaq, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Analytical Study of Many Regression Model Approaches, Arima Model and a Hybrid Model for Forecasting Area, Production, and Productivity of Coconut in Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Teresa De Pilli, Assistant Professor, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Leena Nitin Fukey, School of Business and Management, Christ Deemed to be University, India.

(2) SM Manusha Lakmali, Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Adamou Ibrahim Maman Laouali, University Abdou Moumouni of Niamey, Niger.

(2) K. Chandrashekar, Aurora University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leena Nitin Fukey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (SM Manusha Lakmali, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: DUS-Based Morphological Profiling and Categorization of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Devi Seekiri, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Wajid Khan, Center for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) George Timothy Opande, Kaimosi Friends University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) P. Meenakshisundaram, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rama Devi Seekiri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wajid Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI Robotics Technology: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Kannan, Kamaraj College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Nawal Fadhil Abbas, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Jian Yuan, Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Qilu University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hamzah Hadi Qasim, Basrah University for Oil and Gas, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Kannan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nawal Fadhil Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jian Yuan, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: RNA Expression Pattern for Post Mortem Hair Samples: Forensic Implication

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Choon Wah Yuen, Senior Lecturer, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

(3) Dr. Fagbadebo Omololu Michael, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(4) Dr. Rachid Masrour, Professor, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah University, Iraq.

(2) Nang Khin Mya, University Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.

(3) Vishal Mehrotra, Rama University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Esai Amutha Prabha, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) David Kass, Eastern Michigan University, United States of America.

(3) Reyam Naji Ajmi, Al-Mustansiryah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nang Khin Mya, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Vishal Mehrotra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_4_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of Olorunsogo Gas-Fired Power Plant Phase I

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Safril, Politeknik STMI Jakarta, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geraldo Creci Filho, IFSP-BRA, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Imam Mukhlis, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raheel Muzzammel, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Safril, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA