Peer Review History: Effect of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)- Pulses Intercropping System with Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield of Pearl Millet

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmonnem Kahlel, Technical Agricultural College, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Pablo Huerta Fernández, La Molina Agrarian University, Perú.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Codruța Mihaela Dobrescu, The National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Pitești University Centre, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdelmonnem Kahlel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pablo Huerta Fernández, Perú) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Millets for Climate Resilience and Nutritional Security in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakos Ileana – Sorina, University of Petroșani, România.

(2) Iman Santosa, Indonesia.

(3) Mirela Anamaria Jimborean, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Asia Neelam, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rakos Ileana – Sorina, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Iman Santosa, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mirela Anamaria Jimborean, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment on Endangered Plant Biodiversity of Shirui National Park, Ukhrul, Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar Yadava, Soban Singh Jeena University, India.

(2) Ningthoujam Linthoongambi Devi, Mizoram University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anil Kumar Yadava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ningthoujam Linthoongambi Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of Heat Stress among Greenhouse Workers in Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Francisco Ureña Prieto, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, España.

(2) Michael Atuahene Djan, University of Nebraska, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Francisco Ureña Prieto, España) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Michael Atuahene Djan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Medical Waste, its Environmental Consequences and Management Strategies: A Burning Issue of the Present Day Society

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) David R. Mutekanga, School of Graduate Studies, Bugema University, Uganda.

(2) Wayan Budiarsa Suyasa, Udayana University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akarsh Verma, University of Petroleum, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sachin Ashok Patharkar, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (David R. Mutekanga, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wayan Budiarsa Suyasa, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Potential Therapeutic Activity of Nelumbo nucifera as Anti Inflammatory and Analgesic Agent in Rat Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Professor, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhansu Ranjan Swain, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(2) Vidisha Parulekar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ansari Imtiyaz Ejaz, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sudhansu Ranjan Swain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vidisha Parulekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History:Estimation of Chlorophyll Using SPAD meter

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Himanshu Tiwari, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Riti Prasai, Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Ananthi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Himanshu Tiwari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Predisposing to Postdural Puncture Headache after Spinal Anaesthesia among Elective Caesarean Section Patients at Thika Level 5 Hospital, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, Associate Professor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA and Professor, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Perez Herrero, Universitario de Valladolid, Spain.

(2) Rajesh Bhavsar, South Denmark University, Denmark.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bharathi A, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maria Perez Herrero, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rajesh Bhavsar, Denmark) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Different Sowing Dates and Nutrient Management on Dry Matter Accumulation and Correlation Study for Grain Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum. L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Asma Jabeen, Indian Institute of Rice Research, Osmania University, India.

(2) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, ISCTE-Iul, Lisbon University, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asma Jabeen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Factors Influencing Energy Intensity in G20 Countries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Rakesh Verma, Associate Professor, AKTU Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasir Zulfiqar, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Yusuf Suryo Utomo, Research Center for Energy Conversion and Conservation, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yasir Zulfiqar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yusuf Suryo Utomo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA