Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Towards Progressive Multilateralism: Decoding the Trilemma of State, Democracy, and Globalisation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Associate Professor, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, USA.

(2) Prof. Turgut Tursoy, Near East University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Simin Li, Canada.

(2) Vinita Priyedarshi, Patna Women’s College, Patna University, India.

(3) Radhika Lakshminarayanan, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait.

(4) Richa Sharma, Institute of Professional Studies, Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simin Li, Canada) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinita Priyedarshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Radhika Lakshminarayanan, Kuwait) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Richa Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Mydriasis and Ophthalmoplegia in a 10-Year-Old Girl: A Diagnostic Predicament

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Associate Professor, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sana Nadeem, Foundation University of Islamabad, Pakistan.

(2) Bipin Bista, NAMS, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sana Nadeem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bipin Bista, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Inland Fisheries in Telangana, India: Current Status and Perspectives

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt And Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajinder Kaur, KVK Barnala (Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab), India.

(2) Nurmohammad Naskar, CIFRI (ICAR)Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nurmohammad Naskar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Impact of Technological Interventions on the Yield and Income of Tribal Farm Women’s in Arunachal Pradesh under Eastern Himalayan Region

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) J. Suresh Kumar, St. Joseph University, India.

(2) Sanjeet Kumar, Ambika Prasad Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Suresh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of the Composite Fish Culture Training Impact on Participants’ Knowledge Acquisition in Arunachal Pradesh under Eastern Himalayas

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Egypt And Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Eddy Silamat, Pat Petulai University, Indonesian.

(2) Asfaw Negesse Senbeta, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eddy Silamat, Indonesian) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asfaw Negesse Senbeta, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Enhancing Clustering Stability and Efficiency: A Framework for Optimizing K-means, K-medoids, and K-shape with Intelligent Algorithms

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lamsoudi Redouane, Regional Center for Education and Training Professions Casablanca- Settat El Jadida Provincial Section, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Velivela Gopinath, Sir C R Reddy College of Engineering, India.

(2) Niyaz Mohammed Salih, Erbil Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(3) Bhoomi M. Bangoria, Dr. Subhash University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Velivela Gopinath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niyaz Mohammed Salih, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bhoomi M. Bangoria, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Velivela Gopinath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Different IBA Levels on Growth and Rooting of Semi- Hardwood Cuttings in Pomegranate cv. Kandhari

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Raza, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Ashok Kumar, IIMT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Raza, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashok Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Species Diversity in Coastal Homegardens of Kerala, India: A Study Across Agro-ecological Units (AEUs)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Erhan Unlu, Dicle Üniversity, Turkey.

(2) Selvinaz Gülçin Bozkurt, Biruni University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erhan Unlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Selvinaz Gülçin Bozkurt, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Survey of Groundnut Gardens in Pollachi Taluk of Tamil Nadu, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sureka Karmegam, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Raogo Bernard Sawadogo, University at Norbert Zongo, Burkina-Faso.

(3) Michael Mamman Degri, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sureka Karmegam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raogo Bernard Sawadogo, Burkina-Faso) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Michael Mamman Degri, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Raogo Bernard Sawadogo, Burkina-Faso) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA