Peer Review History: Orchids: A Wonderful Ornamental Plant

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, Grantham Centre, The University of Sheffield, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Ilona Blinova, Subdivision of the Federal Research Centre, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia.

(2) V. Divya Bharathi, Institute of Agriculture, TNAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ameer Hussein Alwash, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.

(2) Antonio Salatino, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Tanta University, Egypt.

(2) S. Suresh, Sona College of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ilona Blinova, Russia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (V. Divya Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Content and DPPH Free-Radical Scavenging Activity of Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb. Planted in Mekong Delta

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, Professor, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR.

Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj Kalita, Arya Vidyapeeth College, India.

(2) Ioana Stanciu, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Quazi Majaz Ahamad Aejazuddin, Ali Allana College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Avinash Singh, AIIMS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pankaj Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ioana Stanciu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examine the Feasibility of Implementing Blockchain Technology in the Sri Lankan Banking System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rachid Masrour, Professor, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, Banking University of HCM City, Vietnam, International University of Japan, Japan.

(2) Doan Van Dinh, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Albina Amin, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.

(2) Sharif M. Abu Karsh, Arab American University, Palestine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A Amarender Reddy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, India.

(2) Gabriela Gheorghiu, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

(3) Sujith.T.S, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.

(4) Sushma Malik, Institute of Innovation in Technology and Management, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, Vietnam, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Doan Van Dinh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Readiness of Institutions and Undergraduates’ Attitude to Online Learning Mode in Nigerian Universities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. José Alberto Duarte Moller, Center for Advanced Materials Research, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Al Muslim Mustapa, The National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Tejeshwari B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

(3) Sabeeha Hamza Dehham, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Al Muslim Mustapa, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tejeshwari B V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sabeeha Hamza Dehham, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical and Nutritional Constituents of Leaf Extracts of Two Edible Medicinal Plants in Nigeria: A Comparative Appraisal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Iztapalapa Campus Av. San Rafael Atlixco, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Anitha, Horticultural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Raja Chakraverty, IPGMER SSKM Hospital, India.

(3) Zubaida Yousaf, Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mamta Kumari, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

(2) Edith Segovia, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay.

(3) Navneet Kumar Verma, Buddha Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Lourdes Zumalacárregui de Cárdenas, Technological University of Havana, Cuba.

(2) Sahar Awadallah Mohamed Hussein, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Anitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Raja Chakraverty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zubaida Yousaf, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Exponential Linear Multistep Methods for the Solution of First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Doina Bein, Associate Professor, California State University Fullerton, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) G Donald Allen, Texas A&M University, USA.

(2) Ahmed A. Hamoud, Taiz University, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Charles Chinwuba Ike, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Dalal Adnan Amer Maturi, King Abdulaziz University-Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Fidele Ngwane, University of South Carolina, USA.

(4) Francisco Caruso, Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Brazil.

(5) Musa Emre KAVGACI, Ankara University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (G Donald Allen, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ahmed A. Hamoud, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A New Approach to Bicomplex Jacobsthal Matrix and Bicomplex Jacobsthal-Lucas Matrix Components

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zhenkun Huang, Professor, School of Science, Jimei University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) K. S. Vidhyaa, Anna University, India.

(2) Valentina Cueva López, University of Jaén, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daili Noureddine, F. ABBAS University Setif 1, Algeria.

(2) David A. Oluyori, FUT, Nigeria.

(3) Honnegowda C K, University of Mysore, India.

(4) Fariha Jumaa M. Amer, Elmergib University, Libya.

(5) Justice Kangah, University of Mines and Technology, Ghana.

(6) Shafiqul Islam, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

(7) Nathier .A. Ibrahim, Al –Turath University College, Iraq.

(8) Patriciu Alina, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania.

(9) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(10) Samir Dey, JIS University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Maysaa Jalil Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Hilal Essaouini, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

(3) Jean-Francois Niglio, Kingston Univerity, China.

(4) Kwame Piesie Frimpong, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(5) Olena Osharovska, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Telecommunications, Ukraine.

(6) Shilpi Jain, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. S. Vidhyaa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Valentina Cueva López, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Applicability of Multispectral Images to Detect Soil Organic Carbon Content in Land Suitability Assessment: A Case of a Sugarcane Plantation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyothi T.V., India.

(2) Ruchuon Wanna, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(3) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, College of Agriculture, AL -Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-Rahman A. Mustafa, Sohag University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jyothi T.V., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ruchuon Wanna, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of WHO Symptom Screening Approach by Non Clinicians in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis among HIV Positive Individuals in the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arthur V.M. Kwena, Associate Professor, Ag. Dean School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Lubna Khatoon, Copenhagen International Institute, Denmark.

(2) Gadou Victoire, Peleforo Gon Coulibaly University of Korhogo, Côte D’ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Farah Naaz, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lubna Khatoon, Denmark) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gadou Victoire, Côte D’ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relative Economics of Farmers Practicing Different Farming Systems and their Impact on Livelihood Security in Mandya District of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Barbara Wieliczko, Institute for Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.

(2) Lamin K M Fatty, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of The Gambia, The Gambia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ailene B. Anonuevo, Philippines.

(2) Rocio Cervantes Osornio, INIFAP, Mexico.

(3) Shahram Gilaninia Iaurasht, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Iskandar Muda, Unievrsitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Barbara Wieliczko, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lamin K M Fatty, The Gambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA