Peer Review History: Comparative Study Based on Simulation of Some Methods of Classical Estimation of the Parameters of Exponentiated Lindley – Logarithmic Distribution

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Totohasina André, ENSET, University of Antsiranana, Madagascar.

(2) Jollanda Shara, University “Eqrem Cabej”, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anwar Hossain, New Mexico Tech, USA.

(2) Francisco Augusto Aparecido Gomes, Federal University of Technology, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Saad Abdullah Manaa, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Totohasina André, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jollanda Shara, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Protein S100B and Amplitude-Integrated EEG as Early Predictive Methods for Brain Injury and Seizures in Preterm Neonates

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S Y Mulkipatil, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, RGUHS University, India.

(2) Todd Richards, University of Washington Medical Center, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atiyeh Rezaei, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(2) Diego Da Silva, Uniensino, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abeer Refaiy, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) Mahomed Sidique Abdul Cadar Dada, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S Y Mulkipatil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Todd Richards, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro and In-vivo Anti-Candidal Effect of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius Leaves Extracts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Mochamad Lazuardi, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Balram Ji Omar, AIIMS, India.

(2) Bello, O. A, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Sk Chand Basha, KL (Deemed to be University), India.

(4) Kiguli James Mukasa, Soroti University, Uganda.

(5) Madhumati Varma, India.

(6) Rahayu Fitriani Wangsa Putrie, Indonesia.

(7) Uday Raj Sharma, BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anil Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mochamad Lazuardi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Response Studies on Organic Amendments and Leguminous Intercropping on Maize (Zea mays L.) Agronomic Traits and Photosynthetic Activity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Avdesh Bhardawaj, India.

(2) Kamal Kant, Aspee Shakilam Biotechnology Institute, Navsari  Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ahmed Fathy Abd El-Khalek, Tanta University, Egypt.

(3) Kapil Kumar Sharma, CPRI, India.

(4) Maamoun Ahmed Abdel-Moneam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(5) UV Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Avdesh Bhardawaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kamal Kant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Creation of Geospatial Database and Estimation of Irrigation Water Requirement of a Canal Command in Gayathri Irrigation Project, Kerala

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yakov G. Verkhivker, Odessa National University of Technology, Ukraine.

(2) Aziz Benhamrouche, Ferhat Abbas University Setif1, Algeria.

(3) Işın Onur, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa, Sohag University, Egypt.

(2) Adeola Akinrinmade, Al-Hikmah University, Nigeria.

(3) Arafat Rahman, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

(4) Chairil Anwar Siregar, National Institute of Research and Innovation, Indonesia.

(5) Eliza E. Camaso, Central Luzon State University, Philippines.

(6) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(7) S. Muthusamy, V.O.Chidambaram College, India.

(8) Subin K Jose, Christ College Autonomous, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Olumuyiwa Idowu Ojo, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yakov G. Verkhivker, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aziz Benhamrouche, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Işın Onur, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Adoption of the Respondent about the Livestock Insurance Scheme

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Balakrishnan, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Bashir A Rather, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Balakrishnan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bashir A Rather, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Association of Maternal Glycemic Control with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Infants of Diabetic Mothers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolas Padilla-Raygoza, Directorate of Teaching and Research, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, Guanajuato, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Munmun Sengupta, University of Calcutta, CMRI Hospital, India.

(2) Katarzyna Rygiel, Silesian Medical University, Poland.

(3) Gilberto Cairo Sáez, Universidad Medica de Villa Clara, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aditi Munmun Sengupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Katarzyna Rygiel, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gilberto Cairo Sáez, Cuba) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Annual Mean Temperature and Rain Precipitation in North America Using NHPP to Detect Climate Changes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. C. V. Sameer Kumar, Head, PJTSAU,  India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangeeta Garg, Mewar Institute of Management, CCS University, India.

(2) Jollanda Shara, University “Eqrem Cabej”, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Felix Nes Mabel, St. Xavier’s Catholic College of Engineering, India.

(2) Maad M. Mijwil, Baghdad College of Economic Sciences University, Iraq.

(3) Nalini Vaidya, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, India.

(4) Norma Aparecida de Oliveira Nobre, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sangeeta Garg, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jollanda Shara, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Colored Polymer Light and Feed Forms on the Performance of Broiler Chickens in the Humid Tropical Climate

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Arjun B. Chhetri, Dalhousie University, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabal Pratap Singh, RVSKVV-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Suman Kumari Joshi, CVSc. & A.H, India.

(3) Hafsan, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Allah Bux Kachiwal, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prabal Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suman Kumari Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hafsan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Survey Study to Assess the Prevalence of Storage Insect Pest on the Seed Health Status of Farmers in Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankur Kumar Tanwar, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adamu Yusuf Arku, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Anselmo Enrique Ferrer Hernandez, Havana University, Cuba.

(3) Asma Jabeen, Indian Institute of Rice Research, Osmania University, India.

(4) Gustavo Bich, National University of Misiones, Argentina.

(5) Joko Prasetyo, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(6) Teresa Pinto, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ankur Kumar Tanwar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA