Peer Review History: Jack Fruit: An Estimation of Hunteria Umbellata Fruit Extract against Formalin Induced Nociception

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Randhir Kumar Gupta, Ranchi College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, School of Medicine, MONASH University, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Randhir Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unsafe Abortion with Perforated Cervical Injury and Consequential Severe Haemorrhage: A Call for Multi-Sectoral Action. “Case Report”

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Professor, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Michel Marcos Dalmedico, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil.

(2) Ivanova Liudmila, Kuban State Medical University, Russia.

(3) Masir Mustafa, Istanbul Gelisim University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Michel Marcos Dalmedico, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ivanova Liudmila, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Masir Mustafa, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioremediation: Sustainable Approach for Pollution Control

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ihsan Flayyih Hasan AI-Jawhari, University of Thiqar, Iraq.

(2) R. Girija, Mercy College, India.

(3) Beena Kumari K S, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adepu Kiran Kumar, Sardar Patel Renewable Energy Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ihsan Flayyih Hasan AI-Jawhari, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. Girija, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Beena Kumari K S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Is there an Electro-Angiographic Correlation in RD Infarction?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yousef Farhaoui, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

(2) Larisa Anghel, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yousef Farhaoui, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Larisa Anghel, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Study on Sustainable Production and Use of Compressed Air in European Industrial Sites of Medium-sized

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Laécio Santos Cavalcante, Universidade Estadual do Piauí,  Centro de Tecnologia Mineral, Brazil.

(2) J. Venkateswara Rao, LBR College of Engineering, JNTUK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amizon Azizan, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(2) Atef Ahriz, Echahid Cheikh Larbi Tebessi University, Algeria.

(3) Radhey Shyam Meena, India.

(4) Shpresa Caslli, Polytechnic University of Tirana – Albania, Tirana – Albania.

(5) Vijay Kumar, Abes Institute Of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Laécio Santos Cavalcante, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (J. Venkateswara Rao, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance-Based Assessment in Contemporary Classroom Assessment: The Forms and Nature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Thanikachalam Vedhathiri, Centre for International Affairs, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, India.

(2) Mohammed Afandi Bin Zainal, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hare Kılıçaslan, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey.

(2) John Jasina, Claflin University, USA.

(3) H. Sudiyono, Republic of Indonesia.

(4) P. S. Venkateswaran, PSNA College of Engg & Tech, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Thanikachalam Vedhathiri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammed Afandi Bin Zainal, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk and Return Analysis of Sectoral Indices in the context of the Bombay Stock Exchange

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Matei Adrian Ducu, Athenaeum University, Romania.

(2) Kristijan Krstic, University of Kragujevac, Serbia.

(3) A. Mohamed Ashik, National College, Bharathidasan University, India.

(4) Gurloveleen Kaur, University School of Business, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.88/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Matei Adrian Ducu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kristijan Krstic, Serbia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (A. Mohamed Ashik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Gurloveleen Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fiscal Decentralization and Social Service Delivery Policy Response in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) N Mose, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Shahram Gilaninia, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

(2) Tasya Aspiranti, Bandung Islamic University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N Mose, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahram Gilaninia, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate and Agriculture in Côte D’ivoire: Perception and Quantification of the Impact of Climate Change on Cocoa Production by 2050

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Reyed M Reyed, Associate Professor, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), City for Scientific Research and Technological Applications “SRTA-CITY” New Burg El-Arab City, Universities and Research Institutes Zone, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hermes Ulises Ramirez Sanchez, Universidad De Guadalajara, Mexico.

(2) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hermes Ulises Ramirez Sanchez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Compatibility of Natural Enemies and Botanical for Management of Earias vittella (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) and Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Bhendi Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Warji, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Ramegowda, G. K., University of Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Kumar, K.S. Saket P.G. College, India.

(2) Oscar Arath Grageda Cabrera, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Warji, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ramegowda, G. K., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA