Peer Review History: Spatial Analysis of School Accessibility in Tarutung District and Its Policy Implications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendranath Gorai, Smt. Savitaben Panalal Korhari College, HNGU, India

(2) Chibuzor Obi Jude, Baba-Ahmed University Kano, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendranath Gorai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chibuzor Obi Jude, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Report on the Bark Feeding Wasp Species on Lowland Apple and Stone Fruit Trees of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheetal Anand, University of Lucknow, India.

(2) Rajesh Kumar Patel, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, India.

(3) Arup Khakhlari, Assam Don Bosco University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheetal Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Kumar Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arup Khakhlari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Management of Sarcoptic Mange in a Deoni Calf in Parbhani, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, Laboratory of Pharmacognosie, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Amita Tiwari, College of Veterinary Science and A.H, NDVSU, India.

(2) Lusekelo Msomba Mwangengwa, University of Agriculture, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amita Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lusekelo Msomba Mwangengwa, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano-fertilizers and Micronutrient Applications on Yield and Economics of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. Heemsohna

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Watitemjen, Nagaland University, India.

(2) Malini Shetty A.G, Surana College, Bangalore University, India.

(3) Amal Hegazi, Horticultural Research Institute (HRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.97/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Watitemjen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Malini Shetty A.G, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amal Hegazi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Productivity and Profitability of Cropping System and Row Ratio on the Performance of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) + Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) Intercropping System

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Baljinder Singh, Guru Kashi University, India.

(2) M V Priya, Acharya N G Ranga Agriculutral University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Baljinder Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M V Priya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A State-of-the-Art Review on Vortex Induced Vibrations Phenomenon Bladeless Wind Turbine Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajkumar Venkatesh Raikar, KLE Dr. M. S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering and Technology, Karnataka, India.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramiro De Matos Bertolina, University of Brasilia, Brasil.

(2) Farooq Shaik, Vignan’s Foundation for Science Technology and Research University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramiro De Matos Bertolina, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farooq Shaik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An IoT-based Fuel Monitoring and Tracking System with Real-time Fuel Level Detection using Accelerometer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajkumar Venkatesh Raikar, KLE Dr. M. S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering and Technology, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Janak D. Trivedi, Government Engineering College, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(2) Shital P. Dehankar, Shivaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Janak D. Trivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shital P. Dehankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Robotics in Mental Health Interventions: Opportunities and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

(2) Prof. Emeritus Luigi Rodino, University of Torino, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Muhammad Tayyab Hassan, Dar As Sihha Medical Centre, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Aakash kumar, Bahria University Health Sciences Campus, Pakistan.

(3) Shazia Muheen, The University of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(4) Melese Sinaga Teshome, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Muhammad Tayyab Hassan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aakash kumar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shazia Muheen, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Melese Sinaga Teshome, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research Progress of Magnesium Phosphate Cement Repair Material

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rebaz Obaidkareem, College of Science, University of Halabja, Iraq.

(2) S Kalane, Dr Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rebaz Obaidkareem, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S Kalane, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Characterization of Coconut-Derived Materials as Potential Adsorbents

Editor(s):

(1) Associate Professor, Department of Materials and Minerals, Faculty of Mines, National university of Colombia, Colombia

Reviewers:

(1) Monsuru Olatunji Dauda, Louisiana State University, USA.

(2) John Godwin, Kogi State College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monsuru Olatunji Dauda, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Godwin, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA