Peer Review History: Moving towards Active Retirement Planning: Does Early Financial Education Matters?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Meghna Jain, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology & Sciences, India.

(2) S. Nancy, Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College and Hospital, India.

(3) Tsung-Hsien Li, Institute of Economics, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meghna Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Nancy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tsung-Hsien Li, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In-vitro Repair Ability of DNA Damage by Anethum graveolens L. Aqueous Extract Using Comet Assay

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Spirina Liudmila V, Siberian State Medical University, Russia and Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Lakhani Neeti, India.

(2) Madhu Sharma, CSKHPKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lakhani Neeti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Traditional Myths and Development Thought: Insights from the Murang Community in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharbari Dutta, IIHMR, India.

(2) Jerald Bermas, Universidad de Sta. Isabel, Philippines.

(3) Zaryab Fatima, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharbari Dutta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jerald Bermas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zaryab Fatima, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of the Nutritional Profiles of Wild and Pond Reared Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Obubra LGA, Cross River State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

(2) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) C. P. Anitha Devi, N.S. S. Hindu College, India.

(2) Shaikh Ummae Umaraha, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. P. Anitha Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaikh Ummae Umaraha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dry Matter Accumulation and Biomass Partitioning of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as Influenced by Genotypes and Sulphur Levels

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Denis M.K. Amara, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

(2) Ali Hussein Raheem, College of Agriculture, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Denis M.K. Amara, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Hussein Raheem, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Nutrient Management for Optimum Growth Traits and Yield of Soybean Crop (Glycine max L. Merr.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna B. Gunjal, Dr. D. Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce and Science College, India.

(2) Santosh Kumar Chaudhary, Nalanda College of Horticulture, India.

(3) Yehia Galal M. Galal, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparna B. Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santosh Kumar Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yehia Galal M. Galal, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Triketone Derivates of Hydroxyl Phenyl Pyruvate Dioxygenase (HPPD) as Potential Herbicides against Diverse Weed Flora in Maize: Efficacy, Phyto-toxicity, Soil Residual Toxicity Impact on Succeeding Sunflower

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Abeegunrin, Titilayo Adejoke, Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Jomell M. Santiago, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abeegunrin, Titilayo Adejoke, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jomell M. Santiago, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Various Weed Control Methods on Weed Density, Weed Control Efficiency, and Seed Yield in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Joshi Sawalkar, Shri RLT College of Science, India.

(2) Saswatik Tripathy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi Joshi Sawalkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saswatik Tripathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Expert Perspectives on the Prescription Practice and Management Strategies for Dry Eye Disease in Indian Settings

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Associate Professor, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chigozie Ifeoma Echieh, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(2) Komal Yaseen, Pakistan Institute of Community Ophthalomology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chigozie Ifeoma Echieh, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Komal Yaseen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Physiological and Agronomic Performance of New Sesame Varieties (Sesamum indicum L.) Introduced in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Juliana Neves Barbosa, Centro Federal de EducaçãoTecnológica de Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) Ablaku, Barnabas Enga, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juliana Neves Barbosa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ablaku, Barnabas Enga, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA