Peer Review History: Effect of Different Levels of Farmyard Manure (FYM) Integrated with Organic Modules on Yield, Quality and Pest Incidence of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Khalel, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Suhad Mathkoor Abdulsaheb Safi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdel-Monnem Sadalaha Khalel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhad Mathkoor Abdulsaheb Safi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of a Choreography-Based Learning Model Focused on Independent Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, The National Teachers College, Philippines.

(2) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(3)Dr. Shaharior Rahman Razu, Associate Professor, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Cigdem Hursen, Cyprus.

(2) Yang Fang, Tianjin Academy of Fine Arts, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cigdem Hursen, Cyprus) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yang Fang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of the Impact of Experiential Marketing in the Tourism Industry: A Bibliometric Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Uhodnikova Olena, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Ukraine.

(2) Sushil Kumar, Amity University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uhodnikova Olena, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Numerical Simulation Study of Wall Thickness Change Rule of Single Point Progressive Molding of Al5083

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Moyeed Abrar, Khaja Bandnawaz University, India.

(2) Saif Ali Kadhim, University of Technology, Iraq.

(3) Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moyeed Abrar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saif Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-demographic Determinants of Healthcare Utilization among Adults in Rural Communities of Benue State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Janvier Gasana, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Shima Sadat Aghahosseini, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Nurhayati, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shima Sadat Aghahosseini, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nurhayati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Trait Association Studies through Principal Component Analysis in Bi-Parental Population Derived from indica/tropical japonica Inter Sub-Specific Cross in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Serhii Rieznik, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

(2) Malini Shetty A. G, Surana College, Bangalore University, India.

(3) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Serhii Rieznik, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Malini Shetty A. G, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mechanism of Antimicrobial Activities of Medicinal Plants Extracts, From Traditional Knowledge to Scientific Insights

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, UCLA School of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sartaz Begum, St John’s University of Tanzania, Tanzania.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

(3) V. Sathyanathan, Apollo College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Ramazan Erenler, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sartaz Begum, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (V. Sathyanathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ramazan Erenler, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Carbon Stock Estimation of Compensatory Afforestation Plantation Work in Balod District of Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Yangiboyev Elmurod, National University of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan.

(2) Lakhdari Kaouthar, Scientific and Technical Research Centre for Arid Areas, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yangiboyev Elmurod, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakhdari Kaouthar, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Phytochemical and Elemental Composition of Andrographic paniculata Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung Cheal Moon, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Industrial Technology Support Division, Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Keerthana Manoharan, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

(3) Jayaprada Rao Chunduri, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Keerthana Manoharan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayaprada Rao Chunduri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Issues of Social Media Usage by Adolescents in their Socialisation Process

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maya Tcholakova, Associate Professor, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahnila Tariq, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Menahal, Sahiwal Medical College, University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahnila Tariq, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Menahal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA