Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Head (Retired), School of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shambhu Sarkar, United States.

(2) Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shambhu Sarkar, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Janvier Gasana, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Samriti Vohra, Gandhi College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Masumi Kamiyama, Jumonji University, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samriti Vohra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Masumi Kamiyama, Japan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Chrispo Makheti Mutebi, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kenya.

(2) N. Senthil, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chrispo Makheti Mutebi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Senthil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Umme Thahira Khatoon, National Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Wan Zuraida Wan Mohd Zain, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umme Thahira Khatoon, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wan Zuraida Wan Mohd Zain, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vasanth V, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Radhamani K, P.K.R. Arts College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vasanth V, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radhamani K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Saeed Seyed Agha Banihashemi, School of International Relations, Iran.

(2) Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(3) P. Shanmugha Priya, Kumaraguru School of Business, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saeed Seyed Agha Banihashemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Shanmugha Priya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Saeed Seyed Agha Banihashemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jelena Purenovic, Associate Professor, Kragujevac University, Cacak, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Wuave Terwase Daniel, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Nigeria.

(2) Saikumari N, R.M.K. College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) Md. Shajedul Islam, Govt. HSS College, National University, Bangladesh.

(4) Faheem Ahamad, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wuave Terwase Daniel, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saikumari N, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Shajedul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Faheem Ahamad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Laraib Javaid, The University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Vijay Prakash, Dharmanand Uniyal Government Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laraib Javaid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijay Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Bodh, Indira Gandhi Medical College, India.

(2) Md. Tanwir Alam, Bihar University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishal Bodh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Tanwir Alam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA