Peer Review History: Barriers and Attitudes towards Mental Health Services in Nigeria: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, Assistant Professor, Doctor Harisingh Gour Central University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shakti Singh Soni, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Sowjanya J, SDMIAH College, RGUHS University, India.

(3) Rohini Kancharapu, Gayatri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering for Women, Andhra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shakti Singh Soni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sowjanya J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rohini Kancharapu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Urea Foliar Nutrition and Leaf Harvesting Intensity on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculta (L.) Walp.]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujata Gupta, D.A.V. (PG) College, India.

(2) M. Thenmozhi, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(3) Samah Mostafa El-Sayed, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujata Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Thenmozhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Samah Mostafa El-Sayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Performance of CFLD on Greengram in West Godavari District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Food Technology Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Edwin Fernando Vásquez Vásquez, Peru.

(2) J. Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Edwin Fernando Vásquez Vásquez, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Vasanthakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Zinc and Silica Solubilizing Microbial Consortia on Soil and Plant Nutrient Status in Paddy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nazimah Maqbool, Retired Professor, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) D. R. Meghawal, MPUAT, India.

(2) Babangida Lawal, Federal University Dutsinma, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. R. Meghawal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Babangida Lawal, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Production and Quality Assessment of Plant-based Yoghurt from Coconut Milk Fortified with Date Syrup

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Saima Tehseen, Assistant Professor, GC Women University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vandna, Rajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, India.

(2) Amsdar Lahoucine, Ibn Zohr University, National School of Applied Sciences, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vandna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amsdar Lahoucine, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Precision Engineering in Oncology: Advances and Applications of CRISPR Technology in Cancer Modeling Using Murine Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarah Iqbal, Dhofar University, Oman.

(2) Ubaid Ullah Khan, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Arjun Pon Avudaiappan, Miami Cancer Institute, United States.

(4) Yan Wisnu Prajoko, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarah Iqbal, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ubaid Ullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arjun Pon Avudaiappan, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Yan Wisnu Prajoko, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and to Develop Strategies for Resistance on the Farming Practices in Ganjam District-An Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. R. Padma, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) N. Sabitha Devi, Telangana Social Welfare Residential Degree College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. R. Padma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Sabitha Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Approximation of the Pressure-discharge Curve in Inline Drip Irrigation System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanimozhi  Kannabiran, NPR College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(2) R. Manju, Kumaraguru College of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kanimozhi Kannabiran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Manju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Outcome of a Single Stage Repair for Proximal Hypospadias in Otherwise Healthy Child at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Muhammad Akram, Associate Professor, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saber M Abdel Maksoud, Port Said University, Egypt.

(2) Tetinou Fouelefack Aloys-Gibson, Universitéd’Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saber M Abdel Maksoud, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tetinou Fouelefack Aloys-Gibson, Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Nature’s Power to Cleanse Water Bodies through Phytoremediation of Aquatic Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, College of Veterinary Science & A.H., Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tutku Ak Erken, University of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart, Turkey.

(2) Bhakti A Mhatre, School of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, D Y Patil Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Ravuri Hema Krishna, Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tutku Ak Erken, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhakti A Mhatre, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ravuri Hema Krishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA