Peer Review History: Acute and Sub-chronic Toxicological Studies of Citrus aurantium Fruit Juice in Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jinyong Peng, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Dalian Medical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuldeep Kumar, Career Point University, India.

(2) Dileep Singh Baghel, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prasanta Kumar MItra, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

(2) Ali Mirabi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) S. Alwin David, V.O.Chidambaram College, India.

(4) Asmaa E. Sherif, Prince Sattam Bin Abdelaziz University, Saudia Arabia.

(5) Basil Abdulzahra Abbas, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(6) Christina Voycheva, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

(7) Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, “Ovidius” University, Romania.

(8) del Carmen Chávez Parga, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, México.

(9) George Ojima Omattah, Kogi State University, Nigeria.

(10) A.K Hasith Priyashantha, Eastern University, Sri Lanka.

(11) Idoko Alexander, Caritas University, University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(12) Mohammad Hassan Houshdar Tehrani, Shahid Beheshti Univ, Iran.

(13) Neagu Tiberiu Paul, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(14) Nina Artanti, National Research and Inovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia.

Rosana Sousa de Oliveira Pinho Azevedo, Bicho Nativo, Brazil.

(15) S. Santhi, Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College, India.

(16) Sava Parascovia, Institutul Stiintifico-Practic de Horticultura si Tehnologii Alimentare, Republic of Moldova.

(17) Sharad Sharma, Gla University, India.

(18) Shimaa Mubarak Fahmy Mubarak, Elwarak Central Hospital, Egypt.

(19) Solomon Demissie Dinku, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(20) Somenath Ghosh, Jai Prakash University, India.

(21) Umar Muhammad Ghali, Near East University, Cyprus.

(22) Utthapon Issara, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(23) Washid Khan, Rani Durgavati University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kuldeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dileep Singh Baghel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA