Peer Review History: A Computational Modeling Study on the Biomolecular Interactions of the Phytoconstituents of Nigella sativa with Anti-Apoptotic Proteins Mcl-1 and Bcl-x1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gul Ozcan, Professor, University of Istanbul, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) Anuupama Suchiita, Maulana Azad Medical College, India.

(3) Rohan Kulkarni, University of Utah, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuupama Suchiita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rohan Kulkarni, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Remediation of Saline Soils Using Halo-Tolerant Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Angel Lhi D. Alcalde, Notre Dame of Midsayap College, Philippines.

(2) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angel Lhi D. Alcalde, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenotypic Screening and Antibiogram of Infectious Ulcerative Keratitis Cases in Tripoli Eye Hospital, Libya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mwalimu Raphael Jilani, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Thokozani Mzumara, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mwalimu Raphael Jilani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thokozani Mzumara, Malawi) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Factors Influencing the Intestinal Microbiota in Children from 0 to 3 Months at the Mother and Child Hospital of Bingerville, Ivory Coast during 2023

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences, Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Andriyana Dmytroatsa, Institute of Agriculture of the Carpathian Region of the National Academy of Sciences, Ukraine.

(2) Zain Ul Abadeen, Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andriyana Dmytroatsa, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zain Ul Abadeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Various Nitrogen Levels and Herbicides Application on Nutrient Uptake and Quality Parameters of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(2)Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Kumari, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Amarjeet Bajaj, B.U. University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amarjeet Bajaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Addressing Production and Marketing Constraints of Arecanut Growers: Insights from Tumcos in Davanagere, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(3) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Naila Umer, Faryal Dental College, Amna Inyat Medical Complex, (FDC/AIMEC), Pakistan.

(2) S.Ragunath, Imayam Institute of Agriculture & Technology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naila Umer, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Ragunath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Relationship Between Body Weight and Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphism in Indigenous Turkeys of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Ayub Ali, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Garima Choudhary, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Ayub Ali, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garima Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Foliar Application of Boron on Yield and Yield Attributes, Assimilate Supply, Production Efficiency and Fertilizers Productivity of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) in Field Experiments

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhurba Banjade, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) K.Anny Mrudhula, Achary NG Ranaga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhurba Banjade, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Anny Mrudhula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Occurrence of Sharp Injuries, Knowledge and Utilization of Post-exposure Prophylaxis among Health care workers In South-South Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Cristina-Crenguta Albu, Associate Professor, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Marhadi, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia.

(2) Liku Muche Temesgen, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

(3) Praful Damor, Parul Institute of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marhadi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Liku Muche Temesgen, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Praful Damor, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Drying Techniques on Quality Attributes of Ready to Reconstitute (RTR) Coffee Mix

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Guido Laércio Bragança Castagnino, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil.

(2) W. Beno Wincy, Chennai Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guido Laércio Bragança Castagnino, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (W. Beno Wincy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA