Peer Review History: Food Security in India: Milestones Achieved So Far

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anubha Das, Zakir Husain Delhi College, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Mahmut Dirik, Sirnak University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anubha Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahmut Dirik, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Different Hybrids of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Terms of Growth, Yield and Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Benjamin Musyimi Musingi, Kenya.

(2) Bushra Mahmood Alwan, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Alabi Olusoji David, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Benjamin Musyimi Musingi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bushra Mahmood Alwan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alabi Olusoji David, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Low Glycemic Index Innovations in Bakery Products: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md. Zakir Hossen, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Dr. Kristina Mastanjevic, Assistant Professor, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.

(3) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rehan Haider, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Shahid Mahmood, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rehan Haider, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahid Mahmood, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Carambola: The Forbidden Fruit for Patients with Renal Disorders

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Enrico Sanjust, Associate Professor, University of Cagliari, Italy.

(2) Dr. Chunying Li, Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, USA.

(3) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Assistant Professor, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Varsha Raj, KharvelSubharti College of Pharmacy, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(2) Ladli Kishore, Maharaja Agrasen University, India.

(3) Anitha Kakkerla, Osmania University, India.

(4) Raj Singh, Maharishi Markandeshwar Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Varsha Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ladli Kishore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anitha Kakkerla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Raj Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing Sales Challenges with Root Cause Analysis to Enhance Business Process

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Ojo Oluwatoyin Emmanuel, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(2) Soh Ann Ni, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ojo Oluwatoyin Emmanuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soh Ann Ni, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Hidden Powers of Glomalin: Insights into Soil Health and Functionality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. A. Elbagermi, Misurata University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Lurdes Jorge, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Portugal.

(2) Anand B. Mastiholi, University of Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lurdes Jorge, Portugal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anand B. Mastiholi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Upholding Seed Quality with Mid-storage Invigoration Treatments in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asma Hanif, Assistant Professor, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kenechukwu Ojiabo, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Nigeria.

(2) Vinod Fogawat, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Jammu J&K, India.

(3) K.Kalaiarasi, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kenechukwu Ojiabo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinod Fogawat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K.Kalaiarasi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Culture Medium, Growth Regulators and Organic Additives on Shoot Regeneration from Hybrid-Seeds of Phalaenopsis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Assistant Professor, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, (Affiliated with H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh.

(2) Inka Dahlianah, Sjakhyakirti University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Shahadat Hossen, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Inka Dahlianah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Boro Rice with Urea Super Granules

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, The University of Sheffield, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) D Jayanarayana Reddy, G Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology(Autonomus), India.

(2) Bangun Joko Laksono, Universitas Graha Karya Muara Bulian, Indonesia.

(3) R. Annie Sujatha, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D Jayanarayana Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bangun Joko Laksono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Annie Sujatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Profile Characteristics of Muga Silkworm Rearers of the Sonitpur District of Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amirsalar Khandan, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran.

(2) Gustavo Lopes Toledo, UNINOVE, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amirsalar Khandan, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gustavo Lopes Toledo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA