Peer Review History: The Diagnostic Significance of the Holter Monitoring in the Evaluation of Palpitation at Tanta University Hospitals

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiv Bagga, Cardiovascular Associates of Arizona, USA.

(2) Prof. (Dr.) Kashmira J. Gohil, Director/Dean, Anand College of Pharmacy, Sharda Group of Institutions (SGI), Agra, India.

(3) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehdi Anvari, National Olympic Academy, Iran.

(2) Prianka, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehdi Anvari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prianka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor 3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Sexual Behaviour Parameters of Marwari Stallions during Breeding Season

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed  Jard  Kadhim, Al- Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Daniel Fernández Abella, University of Uruguay, Uruguay.

(3) Hind Houssou, University of Souk Ahras, Algeria.

(4) Jaya Vejayan, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Samer Saleem Alshkarchy, Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.47/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel Fernández Abella, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hind Houssou, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jaya Vejayan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Non-Chemical Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics and Yield in Blackgram (Vigna mungo)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON levent, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Varsha Gupta, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, India.

(2) Mumtaz Hussain, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Varsha Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mumtaz Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solution of Inhomogeneous Differential Equations with Polynomial Coefficients in Nonstandard Analysis, in Terms of the Green’s Function

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Doina Bein, California State University Fullerton, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Yashwant Singh, Government College, India.

(2) Trinh Viet Duoc, VNU University of Science, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) P.Ramulu, M.V.S. Government Arts and Science College (Autonomous), Palamuru University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yashwant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Trinh Viet Duoc, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adverse Reactions Post-immunization of COVID-19 Vaccines in People Vaccinated from June 2021 to March 2022 in Ouagadougou

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

(3) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Nahidah Ibrahim Hammadi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Didiek Hardiyanto Soegiantoro, Immanuel Christian University, Indonesia.

(3) Boy Rahardjo Sidharta, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

(4) Huda Zuheir Majeed, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(5) Tadesse Mehari, Eritrea.

(6) Chateen I Ali Pambuk, Univ. of Tikrit, Iraq.

(7) José Luis García Vigil, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.

(8) Kenechukwu Enwonwu, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(9) Valentina Divocha, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nahidah Ibrahim Hammadi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Didiek Hardiyanto Soegiantoro, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Boy Rahardjo Sidharta, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Huda Zuheir Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Tadesse Mehari, Eritrea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Simulation of Screening Performance of Linear Vibrating Screen for Sand Sorting Based on Discrete Element Method

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Luu, T. Tung, Vietnam.

(2) Nahid Hida, University Hassan II, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Phani Kumar Vaddi, Seshadri Rao Gudlavalleru Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) P. Maria Antony Sebastin Vimalan, PSN College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luu, T. Tung, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nahid Hida, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Early Results of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Savvas Lampridis, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK.

(2) Priya Ravindra Panicker, Sree Mookamika Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adli Azam Bin Mohammad Razi, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Reza Faraji, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Savvas Lampridis, UK) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priya Ravindra Panicker, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Scleral Buckling VS Pars Plana Vitrectomy: World’s Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Arish, Zahedan Medical University, Iran.

(2) Mohammed Nader Shalaby, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Arish, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Nader Shalaby, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Chemical Treatment and Wrapping Materials on Physico-Chemical Properties and Storage Life of Litchi Fruits (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) Cv. Shahi

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ming-Chih Shih, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prashant B Patil, N N Sattha College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Mamta Rathore, CSAUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Duddumpudi Venkata Sri Akshay, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Lawrence Kabuthi Kabinga, The Unicaf University, Kenya.

(3) Osah Martins Onwuka, Gregory University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prashant B Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mamta Rathore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Pre-Sowing Treatments for the Enhanced Growth, Fruit Yield, and Seed Quality in Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Ashok Chhatre, India.

(2) Neha Pandey, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amruta Shivajirao Shinde, Shivaji University, India.

(2) Nayanmoni Buragohain, Assam  Agricultural University, India.

(3) Pawan Saini, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute (CSR&TI), Jammu-Kashmir, India.

(4) Prachi Garg, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

(5) Trisha Sinha, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amreena Akhter, Sher e Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

(1) Debal Deb, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Ashok Chhatre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA