Peer Review History: Research on Problems and Countermeasures of Online Home Office of Enterprise Employees under the COVID-19 Epidemic

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sadaf Konain Ansari, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(2) Jaesun Lee, Claremont Graduate University, South Korea.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranganathan Venkatesan, Government Arts and Science College, Gingee, India.

(2) Veto Dey, The Oxford College of Business Management, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mohammed Saud Mira, Multimedia University (MMU), Malaysia.

(2) Ravi Akula, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sadaf Konain Ansari, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaesun Lee, South Korea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Circadian Variation of Stroke in a Tertiary Level Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA And Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Latha, The Tamilnadu Dr. M..G.R Medical University, India.

(2) Luis Alberto Camputaro, Hospital El Salvador Specialized Institute, El Salvador.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Latha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luis Alberto Camputaro, El Salvador) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modeling Self Help Groups’ Impact on Livelihoods in Murang’a East Sub-County: A Logistic Regression Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Halim Zeghdoudi, Badji-Mokhtar University, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Bosson-Amedenu Senyefia, Holy Child College of Education, Ghana.

(2) Khairul Islam, Eastern Michigan University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bosson-Amedenu Senyefia, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khairul Islam, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modelling the Relationships of Psychosocial Hazard and Workplace Safety Outcomes among Construction Workers in Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Aldo Irawan, Prima International Tourism Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) K. R. Balasubramanian, National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Aldo Irawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. R. Balasubramanian, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Secondary Breast Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Umarani M K, RIMS, India.

(2) Mali Sunayana Mallappa, Sahyadri College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Sangeetha Naveen, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Angeliki Tiptiri Kourpeti, Greece.

(2) Batool Mutar Mahdi, University of Baghdad- Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Iraq.

(3) Maria Nauside Pessoa Da Silva, Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau Aliança- Uninassau Aliança, Brasil.

(4) Negar Noorbakhsh, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umarani M K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mali Sunayana Mallappa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sangeetha Naveen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of Antimicrobial Activity of Aloe vera and it’s Application

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

(2) Prof. Niranjalie Perera, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(3) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nura Mohammed, Kaduna State College of Education Gidan Waya, Nigeria.

(2) Shakkeela Yusuf, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Vijayanand, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Felicity Pinipay, Andhra University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nura Mohammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shakkeela Yusuf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: What Principle Governs the Chemical Dynamic/Kinetic Process (3)?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fahmida Khan, National Institute of Technology Raipur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K Madhukar, BMS College of Engineering, India.

(2) Israa. A. Jassem, College of Pharmacy, National University of Sciences and Technology, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Noureddine Boumdouha, National Institute of Applied Sciences of Lyon (INSA Lyon), France.

(2) Omamoke O. E. Enaroseha, Delta State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K Madhukar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israa. A. Jassem, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Rare Case Presentation of Chondromyxoid Fibroma Involving the Sphenoid Sinus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashwini Nerkar Rajbhoj, DY Patil Dental School, India.

(2) Hemant Adhikari, Nepal Mediciti Hospital, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priya Sahu, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Shivam Narang, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashwini Nerkar Rajbhoj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hemant Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Rachis Characters of Different Cultivars of Banana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manikant Tripathi, Assistant Professor, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dennis Jack Opwoko, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Kanembou Lawandi, Université de Diffa, Niger.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lamy Lamy Georges Maxime, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plant Studies (IMPM), Cameroon.

(2) Silva Rassul Moreira, University Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dennis Jack Opwoko, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanembou Lawandi, Niger) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Assessment of Germplasms for Anaerobic Germination in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pawan Saini, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute (CSR&TI), India.

(2) Amit Ashok Chhatre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Mishra, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amreena Akhter, Sher e Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pawan Saini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Ashok Chhatre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA