Peer Review History: Assessing the Natural Regeneration Potential of Senegalia senegal by Rejection in Chad: Implications for Sustainable Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunying Li, Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ponugoti Mounica, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Hanaa  A. Abokoura, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Prasad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Beadaa Abdalqader Mahdii, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ponugoti Mounica, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hanaa A. Abokoura, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemically Treated Chicken Feather Meal for Fish Feed

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Assistant Professor, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

(2) Prof. B. Deivasigamani, Annamalai University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Umamaheswari, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(2) Paari KA, CHRIST University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Umamaheswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Paari KA, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive Synthesis and Integrative Review of Agricultural Dynamics in Southwest Nigeria: Assessing Economic Viability, Technological Advances, and Rural Development Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Kumar, Forest Research Institute, India.

(2) Pushpa Kumar, ICAR, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Md Anjar Ali, Kanaklata Modern Academy, India.

(2) S. K. Goyal, BHU, Varanasi (UP), India.

(3) Subhadeep Mandal, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(4) Sujith. T. S, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (Deemed University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Subhash Singh Parihar, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abhishek Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pushpa Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dioscorea dumetorum Pax (Dioscoreaceae): A New Record for the Flora of Jharkhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. J. Rodolfo Rendón Villalobos, Professor, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Golaleh Mostafavi, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Debasmita Dutta Pramanick, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Golaleh Mostafavi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Debasmita Dutta Pramanick, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Cross-National Comparison of curricula in China and the US in Terms of Team Education: The Case of One-Dimensional Equation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Samuel Adamu, Nigerian Army University, Nigeria.

(2) Daniel Clark Orey, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Otiti, Onesimus Elechi, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Rodionov M., Penza State University, Russia.

(3) Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Samuel Adamu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Daniel Clark Orey, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints Analysis in Procurement and Processing of Sesame in Northern Telangana Zone, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Trevisan, Professor, Institute of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Research Centre Biomass, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) J. B. Kathiriya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Hailemariam Assefa, Mekdela Amba University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afaf Ejaz, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Ammara Fazal, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(3) Debajit Borah, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(4) Lokesh P. Sharma, India.

(5) Manobharathi K, Adhiparasakthi Agricultural College, India.

(6) Tansu Uskutoğlu, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

(7) Tibebu Bezabih Arefeayne, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Dipak Kumar Mitra, Bodoland University, India.

(2) Rosa María García Nuñez, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (J. B. Kathiriya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hailemariam Assefa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Ginger Genotypes under Coconut Ecosystem for Quantitative and Qualitative Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Reena Nair, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, India.

(2) B. Thanuja, Sri Sairam Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed M Senan, Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey.

(2) Hanan Elzeblawy Hassan, Egypt.

(3) Sarab Nasr Fadhil, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdulkarim Jafar Karim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Reena Nair, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (B.Thanuja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal_Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Dermoscopy and Histopathology in the Diagnosis of Melanocytic Lesions in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Adegbenro Fakoya, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, St. Kitts and Nevis, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abbas H. Hassin Alasadi, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Md Asim Iqbal, Kakatiya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mojtaba Esmailpour Roshan, Islamic Azad University of Garmsar, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abbas H. Hassin Alasadi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Md Asim Iqbal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characteristics and Management of Pyogenic Liver Abscess: A Rural Senegalese Experience

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mamta Devi Sharma, Shoolini Institute of Life Sciences and Business Management, India.

(2) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad, College of Nursing, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akhila Mettu, University of Missouri, US.

(2) Alessandro Nalesso, University of Padova, Italy.

(3) Kalinca da Silva Oliveira, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.

(4) Pierre Jean Aurelus, IMSS/ UNAM, Mexico.

(5) Shalini Maksane, MGM Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Shaista Riaz, North Ontario School of Medicine University (NOSMU), Canada.

(2) Sujata Gupta, D.A.V. (PG) College, H.N.B.G.University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mamta Devi Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Haider Mohammed Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antiviral Activity of Approved Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Prospects for Drug Repurposing: A review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Claudia Borza, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Dr. Nissar Darmani, Professor, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhu K. Halakatti, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(3) Umang Shah, Charotar University of Science and Technology, India.

(4) Ebru Kondolot Solak, Gazi University, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Türkiye.

(5) Gunasekar Manoharan, New Jersey Bio Science Centre, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farhana Shafiq Ghory, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Ganesh Prasad Neupane, Medical University of The Americas St Kitts and Nevis.

(3) Mahesh K. Gaidhane, Shri Lemdeo Patil Mahavidyalaya, Mandhal RTM Nagpur University, India.

(4) S. Bharanidharan, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

(5) Tapan Kumar Mahato, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, India.

(6) Vittorio Caprio, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.

(7) Yasir Q. Almajidi, Baghdad College of Medical Sciences, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abikesh Mahapatra, Krishna College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(3) G M Malik, Navyug Science College, India.

(4) I Wayan Muderawan, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia.

(5) Srinath Nissankararao, Maxis Clinical Sciences LLC, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prabhu K. Halakatti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Umang Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Ebru Kondolot Solak, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Gunasekar Manoharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA