Peer Review History: Response of Zinc and Foliar Spray of Boron on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Annelise Aila Gomes Lobom, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(2) V. N. Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Maria Arambarri, Universidad Nacional De La Plata (UNLP), La Plata National University, Argentina.

(2) Fatemeh Ahmadnia, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

(3) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré (UNIVC), Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (V. N. Meena Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluate the Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) on the Economic and Physical Attributes of Aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaerten)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) Pablo Huerta Fernández, La Molina National Agrarian University, Perú.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B N Hazarika, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jyotiba Shivaji Kumbhar, India.

(3) T.Amose, The American College Afflicted to Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pablo Huerta Fernández, Perú) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Key Benefits and Application of Nanotechnology in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carpinelli Assunta, CNR-IBFM, Italy.

(2) Shahnaz Majeed, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Royal College of Medicine, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ir. Ida Nur Istina, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Khalida Ali Thejeel, Al-Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carpinelli Assunta, Italy) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shahnaz Majeed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Personal Values of Middle Stage Students in Relation to Their Academic Achievement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nidhi Verma, India.

(2) Aly Abdul Samea Mohamad Qoura, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Grema Ali Dapshima, Umar Ibn Ibrahim El-Kanemi College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Elistina Binti Abu Bakar, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nidhi Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aly Abdul Samea Mohamad Qoura, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Professional Human Resources through Education Program Mobile Teacher in South Sulawesi

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Camino Escolar-Llamazares, Professor, University of Burgos, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Pramila Ramani, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India.

(2) Shashi Verma, SRMSCET, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anurak Singchai, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(2) Bernard Charles, USA.

(3) K. Jawahar Rani, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, India.

(4) Surina Nayan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jomell M. Santiago, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pramila Ramani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shashi Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cowpea Marketing and Consumption Preference in Potiskum Local Government Area of Yobe State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, Professor, University of Western Macedonia, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum, KNUST, Ghana.

(2) Nerisa N. Paladan, School of Graduate Studies and Research, Partido State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Boni Sena, University of Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nerisa N. Paladan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Manufacturing Errors on Tooth Surface Forces in RV Reducer Cycloid Pinwheels

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Huan-Liang Tsai, School of Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinmoy Goswami, Sanaka Educational Trust’s Group of Institution, India.

(2) Giorgio Sonnino, Universite’ Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mrinmoy Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Giorgio Sonnino, Belgium) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Allelopathic Effects of Selected Weed Species on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, Grantham Centre, The University of Sheffield, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Renata Kieloch, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Research State Institute, Poland.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Julio Alfonso Chia Wong, Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva, Perú.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Paola Lombardo, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Renata Kieloch, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Applications of Protoplast Fusion in Plant Biotechnology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatima Lizeth Gandarilla-Pacheco, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Bipinchandra B. Kalbande, Nabira Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Moise Adela Ramona, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(3) Arooj Arshad, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bipinchandra B. Kalbande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Moise Adela Ramona, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Arooj Arshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Market Integration among Major Wheat Markets in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abolfazl Azadi, Assistant Professor, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ahvaz, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Sinha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Setiasih Dra, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Dukpa, St Joseph University, India.

(2) Sushmita Saini, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aditya Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Setiasih Dra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA