Peer Review History: Evaluation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes based on Morphological Traits in Vindhya Region of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Amit Kumar Jain, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

(3) Naheed Bano, MNS-University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anand Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naheed Bano, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cross-cultural Human Resource Management in India: Challenges, Adaptation, and Emerging Trends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Kousalyadevi, Hindusthan College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Ranjan Das, Assam Down Town University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Kousalyadevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjan Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Yoghurt Cultures and Incubation Time in Enhancing Sensory Qualities of Yoghurt and Water Holding Capacity of Greek Yoghurt

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(3) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Katya Petkova Dimitrova, Agricultural University, Bulgaria.

(2) Sunandita Ghosh, School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Katya Petkova Dimitrova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunandita Ghosh, New Zealand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Katya Petkova Dimitrova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Scale to Analyse the Societal Attitude of Farmers towards Adoption of Scientific Water Efficient Practices in Command Areas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Diwakar Kumar, Central University of Gujarat, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diwakar Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Prospective Observational Study on Incidence, Implications and Management of Seizures Following Stroke

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Poulomi Ghosh, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, India.

(2) Amatul Ali Sameera, Sree Dattha Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Tiberiu Paul Neagu, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Poulomi Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amatul Ali Sameera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tiberiu Paul Neagu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Histopathological and Anti-hemorrhoid Effect of the Leaf Extract of Ocimum gratissimum in Croton Oil-induced Hemorrhoid

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aditi Singh, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity Univesity, Lucknow, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gireesh Tripathi, Shri Krishna University, India.

(2) Prabhat Kumar Das, GRY Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gireesh Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabhat Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Survey of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Technology in 3D Printing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Vlad Gheorghita, National University of Science and Technology “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Afiya Parvez Baig, Yashwantrao Bhonsale College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Naveen Kumar Suniya, MBM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vlad Gheorghita, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Afiya Parvez Baig, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naveen Kumar Suniya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in ECOWAS: An ARDL Panel Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alfredo Jimenez Palmero, Kedge Business School, France.

(2) Prof. Choi Sang Long, Raffles University Iskandar, Malaysia.

(3) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) David Umoru, Edo State University, Nigeria.

(2) Fidlizan Muhammad, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (David Umoru, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fidlizan Muhammad, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphological Characterization of Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Lines with their Respective Maintainers in Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) P. Ranchana, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Ranchana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Narrative Review on Emerging Technologies in Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges in Modern Healthcare

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair & Director, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayendra Jadhav, Vishwakarma University, India.

(2) Jyoti Sunil More, Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Muhammad Umer Farooq Mujahid, University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(4) Gaurav Kumar, United State.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayendra Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Sunil More, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Umer Farooq Mujahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gaurav Kumar, United State) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA