Peer Review History: Identification and Evaluation of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes / Varieties for Drought Tolerance: Growth & Yield Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali University (accredited A grade by NAAC), P.O. Banasthali Vidyapith- 304 022 (Rajasthan), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrey Kapustin, Institute of Living Systems, North-Caucasus Federal University, Russia.

(2) Sanâa Lanouari, University Hassan 1, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Andrey Kapustin, Russia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sanâa Lanouari, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Consumers Intention towards Online Food Purchasing in Phnom Penh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chun-Chien Kuo, Associate Professor, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikola Radivojevic, Academy at Applied studies Sumadija, High Technical School of Professional Studies, Serbia.

(2) Adeoye Mary Abosede, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Saeed Seyed Agha Banihashemi, School of International Relations, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:.

(1) Mustafa Göktuğ Kaya, KTO Karatay University, Turkey.

(2) Barbara Wieliczko, Institute for Rural and Agricultural Development, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.

(3) Okanga Boniface, Edinburgh Napier University, UK.

(4) Shahram Gilaninia, IAURASHT, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(2) Endri Endri, Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia.

(3) Hantono, University of Pelita Harapan (UPH), Indonesia.

(4) Mahdi Filsaraei, Hakim Toos Higher Education Institute, Iran.

(5) Ch. V. Rama Krishna Rao, RISE Krishna Sai Prakasam Group of Institutions, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nikola Radivojevic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Adeoye Mary Abosede, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Saeed Seyed Agha Banihashemi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Duality between E-commerce and Cybersecurity: Case of Central Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Sundara Ram, India.

(2) Ejem, Chukwu Agwu, Abia State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon.

(2) Sushil Kumar Pradhan, Gandhi Institute of Technology & Management, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Naresh Sachdev, PCTE Group of Institutes, India.

(2) Rupesh Rastogi, Dr. A .P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Sundara Ram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ejem, Chukwu Agwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Validation of a UV Spectroscopy Absorption Ratio Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Nitrendipine and Hydrochlorothiazide

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Dean, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Saurabh, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) S. Naazneen, St. Mary’s College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manoj Kumar Saurabh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Naazneen, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding Healthcare Regulation in Canada: Strategies for Ensuring Quality and Accessibility

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Jinyong Peng, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Switbert Rwechungura Kamazima, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania.

(2) Mukul Machhindra Barwant, Sanjivani Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(3) Mahmoud Mohamed Elalfy Elhefnawy, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ang Yee Gary, National Healthcare Group, Singapore.

(2) Nure Ishrat Nazme, Combined Military Hospital, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Yinglei Song, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Switbert Rwechungura Kamazima, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mukul Machhindra Barwant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mahmoud Mohamed Elalfy Elhefnawy, Saudi Arabia, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability Students Based on Mathematical Resilience and Gender

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vlasta Hus, Associate Professor, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Karlo S. Sira, Kwadra Technology Business Incubator, Iloilo Science and Technology University, Philippines.

(2) Masnita Misiran, Centre for Testing, Measurement & Appraisal, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Karlo S. Sira, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Masnita Misiran, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Contrastive Analysis of English and Bisayan Languages: Cases of Pronouns in Focus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Rajkumar, Institute of Technology, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Yatin Talwar, AIIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Antonio Luque De La Rosa, Universidad De Almería, Spain.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Rajkumar, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yatin Talwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Validation of an Instructional Module in Science, Technology, and Society (STS) in the Tertiary Education Curriculum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Elias Ezo, Wachemo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Savita Mishra, Vidyasagar College of Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R Ramakrishnan, India.

(2) Supparang  Ruangvanich, Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(3) Senthilkumar Meyyappan, Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elias Ezo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Savita Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Medical Negligence; the Case of the Gambia and Ghana: A Legal Commentary

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Habtamu Solomon Mengistu, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

(2) I. Sundari, Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) A. KIstan, Panimalar Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hadi Khoshab, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Noor Alia Md Zain, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Habtamu Solomon Mengistu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (I. Sundari, India ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (A. KIstan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cultural Signifiers as African Identity in Achebe’s Novels

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Onorina Botezat, Associate Professor, Director of the Center for Linguistic and Intercultural Research, “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeyaraj John Sekar, The American College, India.

(2) Bima Prana Chitra, Universitas Harapan Medan, Indonesia.

(3) S. Barathi, Srinivasa Ramanujan Centre, India.

(4) Sanjaykumar P. Lalani, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

(5) Ismail Petrus, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rahimah Hamdan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Anurak Singchai, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(3) Badeni, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia.

(4) Raymundus I Made Sudhiarsa, Widya Sasana School of Philosophy and Theology, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Patricia Beatrice Mireku-Gyimah, University of Mines and Technology (UMaT), Ghana.

(2) Ismail Petrus, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia.

(3) Irena Nikaj, University Fan Noli, Albania.

(4) Luis Felipe Dias Lopes, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil.

(5) Marta Lacková, University of Žilina, Slovakia.

(6) Mohd Shahrizal Nasir, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Malaysia.

(7) Victorița Trif, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jeyaraj John Sekar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bima Prana Chitra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (S. Barathi, India ) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Sanjaykumar P. Lalani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Ismail Petrus, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA